The Cabinet has approved in principle a bill on public gatherings proposed by the police.
On 6 Oct, Panithan Wattanayakorn, PM’s deputy secretary-general, said that the Cabinet had approved the bill, which had been proposed during the previous government, and forwarded it to the Council of State for vetting in detail.
Proposed by the National Police Bureau, the bill contains 12 sections.
Section 3 states that ‘in order to facilitate and maintain security for public gatherings’, organizers must report in writing to local police at least 5 days in advance, providing details including the objectives, means, place and date, duration, approximate number of participants, and names and addresses of the organizers.
Section 4 prohibits gatherings within 500 meters of royal palaces or 200 meters of hospitals, places for religious rites and schools during school time, blockading government and state enterprise offices, and carrying weapons in gatherings.
Section 5 authorizes police to order demonstrators to disperse and leave the site, provided the gathering violates the law or is likely to harm the lives and properties of demonstrators, other persons or the state.
If demonstrators do not follow the order to disperse, Section 6 allows police to use as much force as necessary in accordance with ministerial guidelines.
Section 7 allows police to seek support from the military and volunteers.
Section 8 penalizes organizers who violate Section 5 with a maximum of one month in jail or 1,000 baht fine, or both. Organizers who violate Section 6 will face a maximum of 3 years in jail or 60,000 baht fine, or both. Demonstrators who carry weapons or explosives will be punished with double the penalties provided by law.
Pol Maj Gen Amnuay Nimmano, Deputy Commander of the Metropolitan Police, said that the bill was necessary and not in violation of the people’s rights, and was for the convenience of demonstrators and to keep gatherings in order.
Comments
Initially this news seems a
Initially this news seems a bit on the oppressive or restrictive side, but most major cities in other countries have what is either called or similar to a Place of Assembly Permit, such as the one in New York City that requires such permits for inside gatherings of 75 or more and outside gatherings of 200 or more. Obviously such permits may not be issued for various reasons, often related to safety, but from time to time political interference can occur.
Frank: I feel it
Frank: I feel it short-sighted to look at the bill the way you do. Yes, applying for a permit is common elsewhere. But, for example, would PAD seek a permit if they really wanted to rally? And if they didn't, would they be dispersed? I doubt it. Given that everything else in the bill already exists, why is the bill needed? I'd say to repress political opponents.
Frank, you are right. We have
Frank, you are right. We have it too. Now the government should prepare for extremsms of both sides,yellow and red. Most of Thai People support the legistration, I guess.
Section 7 allows the police
Section 7 allows the police to call for support from the military and volunteers. Surely the military should only be answerable only to the Prime minister, and Who might the volunteers be the PAD and Nevins Blue shirts?
Is there any detail
Is there any detail concerning what measurs can be employed in order to 'disperse' mobs? Who will hold the responsibility in case of excessive or abusive use of these measures? Who will hold the authority in reviewing and make a call on this?
How can these measures be unprejudicely enforced to all ? Is there any guarantee the enforcers will not 'selectively' apply these measures to 'certain' groups only?
Post new comment