Support for democracy slim if politicians are corrupt

What kind of political system does Thailand have? The question is deceptively simple but the real answer is not.

Thais should stop pretending that we have a clear consensus on what political system we want. Some want electoral democracy, while others want unelected rules via a "benign" elite installed through military coups or other means without widespread public participation.

This, ironically, helps explain why some people went out of their way to offer roses to soldiers who staged the coup in 2006, and then rewrote the |constitution - and why some are now seeking to prevent Parliament re-writing the charter.

The whole mess has little to do with the Constitution and much to do with the love for and loathing of ousted fugitive former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, and fears that if the charter is amended, Thaksin will return home a free and innocent man.

The lack of a society-wide consensus about the country's political system is best reflected in the fact that political rule has swung like a pendulum between that of military dictatorships (or junta-appoint governments) to elected governments.

Basically, many of the so-called |educated and well-to-do Thais still believe that elections are only legitimate as long as their desired political party wins, and that a military coup is acceptable as long as it rids the Kingdom of undesirable politicians. Many less-to-do and less-educated Thais feel that their vote should count - no matter how flawed their elected and winning party may be perceived in the eyes of others.

That is why every dozen years or so, Thailand has a coup, a military regime or a military-appointed regime, then elected government, then another coup - a seemingly never-ending pendulum that swings from elected to unelected governments.

Thai society also has no uniform consensus on issues like the lese majeste law, and even the one-sided positive-only news and information disseminated through the mainstream media about the monarchy institution has failed to keep the lid on growing calls to have the law amended, or abolished.

Eighty years ago, when a revolt took place to end the absolute monarchy and introduce a constitutional monarchy, it was led and enforced by a small group of people, without society-wide deliberation or consensus. Today, we are nowhere near achieving a consensus either.

Many educated and middle-class Thais still feel that the voice of the majority is only legitimate as long as it reflects an endorsement of their preferred political party. They cite voters' lack of adequate formal education, or deception by corrupt and autocratic politicians, as |reasons to disregard the voice of the majority any time, as they did in 2006. Basically, many will stick to the "rules" if it benefits or meets their desired results, but are ready and willing to discard the rules if it doesn't bring their desired |outcome.

These people love to say: Elections are fine if a "good" party or politicians win. And a coup is commendable if a "bad" government is ousted. It's all about good and bad, and nothing about accepting common rules, respecting equal political rights or having a social contract. Thus Thai society should stop fooling itself that most of us have a full commitment to a democratic system.

This writer doesn't know how long it will take for a consensus that is socially binding to be achieved. We have no common political pole to unite around. Unlike in the United States, South Korea or Japan, where coups are unthinkable and unacceptable to most, as long as there is no consensus on a democratic system, military coups or even "judicial coups" will continue to be part of the Thai |political landscape.

Comments

Basically, many will stick to

Basically, many will stick to the "rules" if it benefits or meets their desired results, but are ready and willing to discard the rules if it doesn't bring their desired outcome.

And their desired results are, of course continued rule by the 'elite' minority. And that will never be achieved through an election because the majority will never support their own disenfranchisement,

This 'politicians are corrupt business is a red herring'. Democrats like Suthep are as corrupt as they come. When Thaksin goes the Democrat Party will find a new demon scapegoat.

The Democrats really hate and fear the Thai people. But as long as they are going to go through the motions of elections ... they cannot run on that platform. So they designate a stand-in for the Thai people and hate and revile their doppelganger.

The more radical, and truthful, among the Democrats - the People Against Democracy - embrace outright hatred of the Thai people and are pushing to do away with meaningful elections altogether. Their present work, using the Substitutional Court as their hand-puppet, is meant to neuter the parliament and the government, leaving the ammaat and the military, through their courts, in charge.

This cannot go on. The people, in their majority, will not put up with this nonsense forever. The 'elite' seem bent on the total destruction of the system they claim to honor and to protect.

And it is so stupid and senseless of them. If they devoted themselves to investment in the Thai land and the Thai people rather than in the military and in trying to compete with China in manufacturing, everyone, not least their greedy selves, would be better off.

But they've been stuck for a thousand years in their exploitative and extractive mentality and have made it matter of 'honor', apparently, to keep the people down, no matter the costs. No matter that they, too, are paying them.

Thaksin Shinawatra is an

Thaksin Shinawatra is an elitist billionaire, born with a silver spoon in his mouth, married into an even wealthier and more privileged family, educated in the United States, and on record consorting with and working on behalf of Caryle, the Bush family, and the US-ASEAN Business Council consisting of Fortune 500 corporations!

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/corporate-funded-peoples-movement.html

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/confirmed-thailands-pro-democracy.html

You don't get more elitist than that.

You call Thaksin's diminutive and ever shrinking personality cult, the UDD, the "Thai people," who turned out and gave Peua Thai a paltry 35% backing of all eligible voters?

You are claiming this mass-murdering megalomaniacal, foreign-bent traitor represents the will of the people, or somehow a lesser evil than petty, corrupt elitists of Thai nationalist persuasions?

Get real. You and Pravit and Prachatai - a real case study of humanity's failings.

Oh, but you can, Tony. You

Oh, but you can, Tony. You can. The dems that is running Banks are obvious choice here. But, will you stop plugging your own blog here? I know getting clicks are hard in these times, but geez, have some dignity.

Thaksin is a billionaire, he

Thaksin is a billionaire, he works for the Fortune 500 corporations of Wall Street and London - he is lobbied for by the largest firms on Earth... FACT.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/corporate-funded-peoples-movement.html

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/confirmed-thailands-pro-democracy.html

Yet somehow the "Dems" "running Thailand's banks" are more elite and tyrannical than Wall Street and London? Please explain. And by the way, I do not condone or support the Democrats either and have pointed out as well where they are involved in intolerable incestuous relationships with foreign interests....

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2010/08/asian-economic-community-by-2015.html

PS - my audience is comparable to Prachatai's - despite Prachatai receiving constant publicity from US-British media and millions of baht a year in funding. Ponder that.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/exposed-indy-newspaper-funded-by-us.html

Maybe try matching your cartoon character "progressiveness" with an actual open and objective mind - read the articles, follow the sources cited and put it all together. Name calling means you either can't argue about the facts, or are not interested in the truth to begin with - that isn't progressive- that is backwards and shameful.

Peace.

"The lack of a society-wide

"The lack of a society-wide consensus about the country's political system is best reflected in the fact that political rule has swung like a pendulum between that of military dictatorships (or junta-appoint governments) to elected governments."

Once again Pravit practices the same insidious dishonesty that you find in the rest of The Nation.

There is a HUGE appetite for democracy in Thailand - turnouts for elections beat pretty much every single more established democracy and Pheu Thai have one of the largest electoral mandates for a single party on earth.

What does Pravit think a "consensus" looks like? A group of octogenerian, corrupt generals and their beneficiaries in the same tiny Bangkok class of minor aristocrats and well-connected elites that is Pravit's world sitting around making deals?

The democratic consensus is already present with a huge number of people in Thailand - that's the definition of "consensus" - not the constant kowtowing to a small number of Bangkok-based rich kids and elites.

When will the coups stop? They don't happen mysteriously but because certain power groups (of which Pravit is a member) benefit - How can Pravit not realise this? My personal experience of Pravit is that he is just as much threatened by members of his class being usurped by the prai as anyone else. In a democracy no-one is going to care much if Pravit was a "chevning scholar", if he to Oxford or didn't or how powerful his father is.

So, once again Pravit fails to present a coherent or even cogent analysis. He should stick to defending ASTV and Manager.

Peua Thai secured only 35% of

Peua Thai secured only 35% of all eligible voters last election - they have been outright defeated in several of their strong holds since - their campaign slogan was literally "Thaksin thinks, Peua Thai does," meaning, & even you can figure this 1 out Spooner, a CONVICTED CRIMINAL, who demonstratively mass murdered 2,500 people during his term in office, & ran roughshod over rule of law is running this party you defend.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/thailand-globalist-stooge-returns-to.html

The "consensus" & "appetite for democracy" you attempt to describe is clearly, to all with functioning discernment, a personality cult....

some_text

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/04/bizarre-us-backed-cult-on-pilgrimage-to.html

...to the point where its exploited, ignorant devotees literally wear images of a crooked billionaire elitist working for even bigger foreign elitists (the Fortune 500) mistakenly believing he is the "people's champion." They literally gather to hear this convicted criminal, hiding in Dubai to escape the rules and laws of this "democracy" you defend, speak, and not just speak, but dictate what it is they must do next.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/corporate-funded-peoples-movement.html

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/confirmed-thailands-pro-democracy.html

You seem to not understand then, Spooner, what democracy actually is... it is not a billionaire calling up from Dubai to tell people what they want & should do next, its the PEOPLE who independently decide what they need & want within the context of the rule of law, & their elected representatives are then charged with carrying it out.

Spooner, what you are defending is democracy in reverse - also known as DICTATORSHIP, projecting its desires and demands upon the people through manipulation & propaganda, then claiming the mobs they control from the top down, are the "grassroots" aspirations of the people.

Tony either you are big liar

Tony either you are big liar or you are mixing up Peua Thai and democrats.

The truth is that democrats were not able to secured the 50% +1 majority they needed to get elected and they can form a government only if the army puts them in charge.

Moreover, democrats even lost a lot of voices in their strong holds.

How can you look at yourself in the mirror in the morning? You have no shame of lying like that?

Get a life!

Who said the Democrats had a

Who said the Democrats had a mandate? If the winning party, Peua Thai, has only 35% of eligible voters selecting them and is run by a violent personality cult led by a convicted criminal, the runners up are at least as illegitimate.

I have never, nor will ever support the Democrats. I am just pointing out how equally illegitimate Peua Thai is. Can you wrap your mind around that?

Unfortunately for you, you live in a world of A or B - where as I live in a world where I refuse to accept this dead end, false choice between equally corrupt elites - one simply better at masquerading as the manifestation of the "people's will."

Your reasoning will lead to one elitist clique replacing another - with tragic consequences . Alternatively, having an open mind and seeking REAL, pragmatic alternatives will actually improve society.

You can continue to be sophomoric and adversarial, or you can admit neither party has a mandate to run the country. The number of 35% of eligible voters selecting PTP can be found at the EC's own webpage - accepted as accurate by both leading parties.

The link and breakdown is at the top of this article...

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/thailand-globalist-stooge-returns-to.html

"Peua Thai secured only 35%

"Peua Thai secured only 35% of all eligible voters last election - they have been outright defeated in several of their strong holds since - their campaign slogan was literally "Thaksin thinks, Peua Thai does," meaning, & even you can figure this 1 out Spooner, a CONVICTED CRIMINAL, who demonstratively mass murdered 2,500 people during his term in office, & ran roughshod over rule of law is running this party you defend."

Tony, whatever is this shit you are talking?

Pheua Thai won according to the rules (and thy did not make the rules). Because you don't like the result you try to say they should not have won because they failed according to an arbitrary set of rules you made up while taking a dump this morning.

Thaksin is generally believed to have been convicted by the same set of judicial wankers as are currently trying tooust yet another government in yet another judicial coup. In other words, the Thai judiciary probably couldn't make fair decisions even if they hadn't been lobotomised by Prem and his brown-nosing dementors..

I agree completely with Peter, get a life - and if necessary try to get your hand surgically removed from your dick.

Please...

Another enlightening insight

Another enlightening insight into the mind of a Prachatai reader - name-calling, immaturity, and an argument devoid of facts or figures to back up their own, veritably arbitrary stance.

Hey "Anne" are you done looking over the evidence about Somyos & his "Voice of Taksin" criminally threatening the lives and safety of the judges you asked for?

http://2bangkok.com/threatening-judges-who-defy-thaksin.html

Or is this what you do... pretend evidence doesn't exist, ignore it when it is repeatedly thrown in your face, and move on to your next series of juvenile insults?

The fact is, according to the EC, which PTP concedes counted right - PTP only secured 35% of all eligible voters. By the rules that makes them the winners because their opponents did even worse. But to claim this is a clear "mandate" by the people is obviously, logically, mathematically flawed.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/thailand-globalist-stooge-returns-to.html

It illustrates a lack of faith across society in the system as a whole - a problem that anyone serious about true representative and just governance would address. You clearly believe that Thaksin is an innocent victim singled out by the court - you are clearly an apologist for this man's serial violations against the laws he was charged to uphold, the rights of the people he supposedly represented, and the interests he truly, demonstrative serves instead of the Thai people's.

Cogent, objective minds looking over this exchange won't pay you any mind - and those that will are not of my concern.

To TONY: If you say to me you

To TONY:

If you say to me you will not give your opinion on a pending decision, and allow me to make the decision alone, you cannot afterward suggest it was not a valid decision because you waived your input.

Imagine we are 20 partners in an enterprise. Your 1/20 input is not counted because you preferred not to give it as a vote. Afterward, you cannot say 10 votes were only half the number of partners and therefore not a majority. Those ten votes would equate to about 53%. Your absent vote means nothing statistically if you yourself decided not to participate in the vote. You would have no recourse.

The same with the election numbers.

.....

In the article I read this: "the fact that political rule has swung like a pendulum between that of military dictatorships (or junta-appoint governments) to elected governments"

I disagree totally. A pendulum suggests an equal swing both ways, back and forth. The years of democracy are far outweighed by the years without it. Even the years of so-called democracy have often been a sham.

Only 35% of eligible voters

Only 35% of eligible voters voted Peua Thai last election -of those that even bothered to vote, PT still failed to secure a popular majority.

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/thailand-globalist-stooge-returns-to.html

Robald - it seems, and please correct me if I'm wrong - you are suggesting that its people's own fault they are disillusioned with the entire system and refuse to participate - and because of that, they and the fact that they feel that way, don't count - and the meager support the government does get lends them not just a "legally mathematical mandate" but despite a real, mathematical minority supporting them, a moral-social mandate as well.

Robald - I will argue that no it does not and that anyone serious about a real representative government will view the last election results as a symptom of a much larger problem - and Robald - a problem by no means confined to Thailand or Asia.

Rampant elitist exploitation has done a masterful job in the West of dressing itself up as "progressive" and "democratic," but people are seeing through it. They realize no matter WHO they vote for, those people don't represent their interests, even if one is prone to throw more bones their way than others.

I don't pretend to know what the ultimate solution is - though I suspect improved education, faith in one's ability to solve their own problems locally, and pragmatic local self-sufficiency, independence, and real tangible self-determination is part of it - but I know for sure that if a government only gets 35% of the population behind it - THERE IS A REAL PROBLEM - saying nothing of what that implies for the runners up!

This is not a corporation - Thais don't have the option of finding another business to be involved in. This is their home, if they are disillusioned, it is a problem that must be addressed, not swept under the rug by tenuous technicalities.

Well, Tony, I have to say you

Well, Tony, I have to say you nailed it this time. Correct, I am not intersted in your factoids, correct I am not interested in your 'evidence', both because I honestly doubt you could lie straight in bed, and reality doesn't seem to be your strong suit.

You are in no position to lecture me on maturity when you say the kind of dumb-ass things you say, and then whine and complain when people just can't take you seriously.

You are a fruitcake conspiracy theorist who considers evidence to be whatever it was that you said last. You seem to me to be the kind of guy that can look out of a window, see it is raining, and truly believe that the rain is clear evidence that a volcano just erupted 3 doors down the road from you.

In short, you appear for all the world to be delusional, so if you can give me a couple of good reasons why I should take a delusional nutcase conspiracy theorist who has probably never strung 2 causes and an effect together in a straight line seriously, then I would be very glad to review my opinion of you. Until then I'll just laugh at you because its easier.

Ad-hominem perhaps? Yes, but then the way you present yourself, I doubt even the pope would be able to resist the temptation to kick your ass. On the plus side, kicking your ass is easy sport.

Have a great day watching the rain come down and wondering what it all means...

Some comments have become

Some comments have become even more irrational and insulting than we are used to on this site. Lets try to keep exchanges at least reasonably civilised. The "lobotomised" judges have rightly thrown out the senseless objections to the Charter Amendment Bill submitted by the Democrats.

And 35% of the electorate gave PT a commanding majority of seats in Parliament, which is most definitely a mandate - logically, mathematically and, perhaps most importantly, legally. Trying to argue otherwise is just pointless, and a denial of reality.

"Lets try to keep exchanges

"Lets try to keep exchanges at least reasonably civilised." Why's that then? Personally I consider it uncivilised for a delusional monkey like Tony to throw shit around like he does. But that's just me I suppose. "The "lobotomised" judges have rightly thrown out the senseless objections to the Charter Amendment Bill submitted by the Democrats." Hmmm. Well, lobotomised, brainwashed and propagandised they may be. Tools of the existing feudal structure in Thailand they may also be, but know what fear feels like they most certainly do, and they were frit to death that the whole world would see just how the Constitutional Court in Thailand breaches the provisions of the constitution, fails to adhere to its own precedents and is somewhat partial to feeling important. So yes, they abandoned their attempted judicial coup and saved whatever face they could by pretending they were entitled to do what they did.

Like all Thais really, especially if they have a direct line to the palace and the privy council president.

...

[...contents omitted by Prachatai moderator.]

Yes, Robin. Shockingly, the

Yes, Robin. Shockingly, the Substitutional Court did do the obviously correct thing with respect to the absurd charges of the parliament's trying to "overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of the State under this Constitution or to acquire the power to rule the country by any means which is not in accordance with the modes provided in this Constitution".

But they wrongly insisted that, à la Article 112, anyone may waltz up to their offices at anytime and "break the glass" again, feigning an ... emergency! ... rather than following what Article 68 of the Substitution itself actually says. I guess they are the doubly Substitutional Court, in that they are making their own substitutions for what the Royal Thai Army's Substitution of 2007 actually does say.

Too, they seem to be giving wind to the Democrat's sail, insisting that a new Constitution must pass a referendum before the parliament undertakes the procedure clearly laid out in the Substitution itself for its amendment. The grounds they give for this ad lib is that although the Royal Thai Army's 2007 substitution was preceded my an armed insurrection rather than a referendum it was followed by a referendum, coincidentally under threat of another armed insurrection if it did not pass.

In short the Substitutional Court has given the clearest possible evidence why both it and the Royal Thai Army's Substitution itself need desperately to be replaced by the enactment of a bona fide Constitution.

It is now up to the redshirts to see that one is drawn up and adopted. I think the Khana Nitirat's outline is an excellent point of departure, myself.

Robin - if a ruling party has

Robin - if a ruling party has only 35% of eligible voters backing them - you call that a mandate? Yes legally it is a mandate, mathematically, within the confines of such legality it is a mandate ....

But 35% of a population approving of a government is not a mandate. And when you consider the fact that said government is:

1. Run overtly by a convicted criminal, mass murdering traitor, working for foreign interests....

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/corporate-funded-peoples-movement.html

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/confirmed-thailands-pro-democracy.html

2. Nominated said criminal's sister to run in his place via overt 3rd world nepotism....

some_text

3. Clearly, demonstratively cultivating a personality cult exploiting the most vulnerable members of Thai society (but by no means a majority)....

some_text

4. Constantly both threatening and committing acts of violence when legality and opposition obstructs their agenda....

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/05/atrocities-made-to-order.html

It has even LESS of a mandate!

Robin, how is it that you don't see this? There is no doubt that Thaksin is running the PTP/UDD from the top down - the rally, including the leaders claiming they are independent of Thaksin, sit there on the stage clapping for the big-screen when Thaksin phones-in his directives from Dubai.

Thailand has problems. All nations do, but to say these problems are so drastic it could in anyway justify this dangerous elitist personality cult, driven by even more corrupt and tyrannical foreign interests is an absolute departure from logic or reason. Promoting mob rule orchestrated by a billionaire elitist, runs contra to 2,500 years worth of democratic progress.

No, absolutely not right.

No, absolutely not right. Another extremely unpleasant comment, and ill considered too, from one of these types who make derogatory remarks about the Thai people.

No, absolutely not right.

No, absolutely not right.

Well there you go. You say its wrong, I say its right. You evidently confuse not liking something with it being incorrect. It's OK, its an easy mistake to make, lots of people make it, check out John Francis (the 'Francis' is really important) Lee. He often makes the same mistake as well, confusing reality with the pictures in his head.

Another extremely unpleasant comment...

Think you so? Perhaps you consider the comment unpleasant but the unpleasant reality fully acceptable Robin. Perhaps you need to get out more... you know, smell the coffee. But I fear I have annoyed you. Which is probably something I should care about.

...and ill considered too,

Not at all, fully considered and carefully articulated.

...from one of these types who make derogatory remarks about the Thai people.

Indeed, but then perhaps I just see more and understand more. Perhaps I should call you 'one of those types who has still has tourist stars in his eyes'. I remember those days too - but I grew out of it, as you will in time I'm sure.

But I see I have annoyed you. Try not to take it so seriously Robin, its only dots on a screen and people will interpret them differently. One of the wonderful things about online forums is that its not obligatory to agree with other viewpoints. look at Tony and JFL, almost nobody agrees with them but do they get all knotted up? No.

Mind you, they don't learn very much either I suppose. I'm sure Forrest Gump would have had something to say about that.

Folks - Miss "Anne Thropic's"

Folks - Miss "Anne Thropic's" (Misanthropic - get it, oh boy how clever) comments are clearly more to do with their personal infliction with unmanageable narcissism, self-loathing, an inferiority complex, and obvious insecurities that have manifested themselves in this bizarre adversarial posture - than anything to do with "Thai politics."

"Anne" is frustrated with a lifetime of believing they are special and people not recognizing them for it. Now they scour the planet for anything that is respected, admired, or functional, and attempt to bring it down to the same level of dysfunction and defilement as they finally realize they are on.

I think on one level or another - this psychological infliction is grappled with by a lot of the Thaksin-supporters - not the well-intentioned 3rd grade-educated country folk being exploited - but the highly educated Westernized - therefore more prone to believing their "genius" should but hasn't been properly recognized.

"Anne" is an acute case though. I'd swear "Anne" was Andrew MacGregor Marshall - I'd hate to think there's more than one person on Earth inflicted with such unhinging narcissism, deceitfulness, and attention whoring...

But what I'm really trying to say is - "Anne" is an intellectual slob wallowing in a pile of their own nihilistic filth - and "Anne" should, and will wallow in that filth, on the sidelines of humanity, alone.

Get well soon "Anne" - until then, I'm ignoring you.

Excellent, some

Excellent, some pop-psychology on a par with your level of expertise on everything else.

"Get well soon "Anne" - until then, I'm ignoring you"

Result! I didn't think it would be so easy, you're really a pushover when you don't have anything sensible to say, aren't you?

Erm, that's always then. Sorry. Silly of me.

Annie

ps how long did it take you to work out the misanthropic then? I bet you had to call a friend.

Prachatai Editor: Apologies

Prachatai Editor:

Apologies for not highlighting this earlier, but I think you should delete comment 27648. Freedom of speech is of course important, but the final paragraph in particular is grossly offensive and probably illegal.

Anne and Tony ought to tie-up

Anne and Tony ought to tie-up (get married). Matching wit and witticisms, offensive styles, unabashed errors in logic added to dismissal of common sense...well, it's a match lit in Heaven.
As to both's posts, they are worthy of an eraser - that is all.

Well, to be fair, I only

Well, to be fair, I only posted a few times and only responded in kind when that idiot Tony chose to be combative. Trying to be the alpha male I'm sure.

Nothing like a quiet life, but with the daft PC brigade (John Francis Lee), and the conspiracy brigade (the idiot Tony) ruffling the waters, whats a girl got to do to get some peaceful conversation?

And then stars-in-his-eyes-tourist Robin Grant accuses me of something illegal, I have no idea why. Go figure.

As for quality of posts, do some sums. The serial spammers John Francis Lee (the 'Francis' is just *so* important' and the conspiracy theorist 'crazy' Tony Cartalucci account for nearly 80% of the posts to the english language forum Prachatai. Its difficult t hear a whisper in a thunderstorm, as you know, if you hacve a problem about quality, go talk to them.

Much good may it do you trying to thump some sense into those two - lowest-common-denominator posting is all that's really left for the more intelligent remainder.

If you are in Thailand there

If you are in Thailand there are better ways of being entertained than challenging two of the forum's most prolific wannabees, whether ye be a lass , lassie or lasso.
New Mandala seems to have a semi-monopoly on more serious stuff, but even there it's a bit ego-centric toward what the website's creators and frequent contributors feel is good (their kind of) writing. FACT updates once a week, and despite my own proclivities toward a teeny weeny bit of censorship for the sake of human decency, they tend to be totally 100% anti-censorship.

New Mandala is run by the

New Mandala is run by the intellectually dishonest "Dr." Andrew Walker who is regularly berated even by his readers for peddling baseless, unproductive propaganda to undermine a political system he has made abundantly clear he personally dislikes. Instead of delineating his personal and professional conclusions, he couches one within the other - disgracing academia in the process.

100% against censorship? He censored my comments when I pointed out he contributed to a Lowy Institute paper. He denied it amongst a very condescending and unbecoming comment, and when I posted the link - he deleted it and banned me from his website.

some_text

And here's the link to the report, find on the last page, listed his name....

http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Thai-Studies-in-Australia_final-report.pdf

Hilariously, this pretend-academic had the report, which on page 15 lists his name, ON HIS OWN WEBSITE. The man lies when it would better suit him to tell the truth. This is the common denominator between all the faux "democracy" promoters.

So you go on defending New Mandela as if it is any better or somehow "above" this US State Department-funded claptrap - but they are one in the same.

And Mr. Knight, keep up the good work of calling people petty, baseless, and immature, by being petty, baseless, and immature. Under no circumstance actually offer up an intellectually sound, factually based rebuttal.

God almighty. Just when you

God almighty. Just when you thought he couldn't get any worse...

He gets worse.

Of course Andrew Walker is dodgy, of course New Mandala is dodgy, but you Tony are in a class of dodgy all of your own. People in glass houses should not throw stones, but I suspect nobody ever told you about the dangers of appearing ridiculous.

Hey Tony, you seem to like

Hey Tony, you seem to like writing a lot. Go write a book.

Prachatai reported Thai

Prachatai reported Thai regulars fired "indiscriminately" at peaceful protestors; a tragic, damaging & surely intended deception.

Tony forced Prachatai to admit they're funded by the Soros-globalists, who foment civil wars and atrocities. Prachatai then insulted decency by claiming sponsors don't influence editorial policy.

The disingenuous feigned ignorance of those who pretend democracy is anything other than an insulting 'gift' to vassals imprinted to personality cults, is nauseating. We are feudal slaves; emotionally & intellectually retarded by malicious corruptive deception which is blasted at impressionable children to exploit them for life.

Power needs Slaves to build pyramids for pennies; Soldiers to fight, kill and die in slave wars which 'legitimise' the Protection Rackets of 'Government' and 'Law'; Consumers conditioned to want what we cannot have; and Breeders to raise children to please & ensure the perpetuity of miserable exploitation.

We are powered by pain. We respond only to emotive appeals & domestic terrorism. We fear everything but fear itself. We trust everyone that lies to us. We exploit with the Confidence Trick of love.

We're worse than sociopaths. We wield selective empathy.

I don't know much about geopolitics. I don't know if evil can be defeated. I don't know squat.

I only know what I know, & these Truths are self-evident:
* Humans should not fear Humanity.
* Westphalia 'sovereign' nation-states are a paradoxical illusion created by Holy Evil who made sociopaths into 'sovereigns'.
* States exist to exploit their own.
* States conduct domestic terror campaigns.
* Literally every government on the planet is isn't acting in the best interests of its people. ~7.2 of ~7.3 billion humans will never speak Thai.

Kings love their Treason,
But the Traitor they hate.

I know lies kill billions.

You all claim the moral high ground whilst rationalising your deceit as justified means to various ends. Your intent is as relevant as considerations of mea culpa.

We are in a War for the survival of the species & we are getting obliterated by ~7.3 billion Traitors betraying each other & ourSelves. You imagine you're shrewd & crafty. You optimally play endless games of Prisoner's dilemma.

The Truth is humans suck at game theory. We would not be Prisoners facing endless dilemmas were it not for our Self-defeating deceit.