Thailand: Two Years After Crackdown, Still No Justice
Victims Would Bear Brunt of Proposed Amnesty
(Bangkok, May 15, 2012) – The Thai government has not arrested or charged a single soldier or official for any of the scores of deaths and hundreds of injuries during the political violence in Bangkok two years ago, Human Rights Watch said today. The Thai government should withdraw an amnesty bill submitted to parliament that would shield all those involved in abuses during the 2010 violence from prosecution, Human Rights Watch said.
In a video released on May 15, victims and their family members from both sides demand justice and tell Human Rights Watch that the failure to investigate and prosecute those responsible for abuses during the 2010 violence would lead to a cycle of violence and impunity.
“Despite well-documented atrocities that took place in the full view of cameras and witnesses, no Thai soldier or official has been held accountable,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The military should not be above the law. The government needs to prosecute all those responsible for crimes, whatever their political affiliation or official position, to provide justice for the victims and end the cycle of violence and impunity.”
From March to May 2010, the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), known as the “Red Shirts,” held a mass protest against the government. In Thailand’s most violent political confrontations since pro-democracy protests against military rule in 1992, at least 90 people died and more than 2,000 were injured. Arson attacks in and outside Bangkok also caused billions of dollars in damage. Human Rights Watch’s May 2011 report “Descent into Chaos” concluded that the military used excessive and unnecessary lethal force and that armed elements within the UDD called “Black Shirts” engaged in attacks.
The previous government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva established the Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand to investigate and report on the 2010 violence. The Abhisit government charged UDD leaders and hundreds of UDD protesters with serious criminal offenses, but did not file charges against any government officials or military personnel. Since the government of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra took office in August 2011, the focus of criminal investigations has shifted entirely to cases in which soldiers were implicated, while ignoring those involving UDD violence.
According to the Justice Ministry, more than 600 people have been charged for alleged violence and other crimes in connection to the UDD protests. Of those charged, 290 were arrested and 53 of them remain in prison. The Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand found that the charges against many of the UDD protesters were summary and excessive. No soldiers or governments officials have been arrested or charged by either the Abhisit or Yingluck governments.
The investigation by the Department of Special Investigations (DSI) has progressed slowly. Of the more than 90 known deaths, only 16 cases have been sent by the DSI to the prosecutor to launch post-mortem inquests. The Truth for Reconciliation Commission has missed a series of reporting deadlines and has not been given sufficient resources and powers to fulfill its mandate, Human Rights Watch said. Another inquiry conducted by the National Human Rights Commission has suffered from mistrust and lack of cooperation from participants in the events.
Families of victims from all sides told Human Rights Watch they welcome the decision by the Yingluck government to provide reparations to those harmed by the 2010 violence. However, many families fear that financial compensation will be offered as a substitute for a full investigation and a process for bringing perpetrators of violence to justice.
Human Rights Watch expressed grave concern about the March 27 proposal by the ruling Pheu Thai Party and coalition partners in the parliament for a broad amnesty for leaders and supporters of all political movements, politicians, government officials, and members of the security forces involved in the 2010 violence.
Former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra on April 15 responded to those opposing the proposal for amnesty and political reconciliation that, “Mother of Katekamol Akhard, volunteer nurse who died during the dispersal at Ratchaprasong, is still angry that her daughter was shot by soldiers and does not want to have amnesty … But we have to listen to [what is] the greater good. And the minority [voice] should make a sacrifice.”
“The Yingluck government came to power promising justice to the victims of political violence. It should resist pressures to engage in a whitewash,” Adams said. “Current efforts to pass an amnesty law for serious abuses committed by government forces and armed protesters would be an affront to victims, who seek and deserve justice.”



Comments
The hypocrisy of HRW watch
The hypocrisy of HRW watch and Sunai Phasuk plumbs new depths.
Here they are complaining about an amnesty when they basically supported the 2006 coup, offered to work with coup leaders and attempted to advise them as well.
What about the amnesty for the 2006 coup leaders that as far as I can tell HRW accepted without even a murmur?
Liars and hypocrites. Sunai Phasuk and HRW.
HRW and Sunai in particular
HRW and Sunai in particular being liars and hypocrites - that's really interesting. Can't say I disagree, but probably for different reasons...
Too bad you weren't here today Andrew Spooner - you could have told Sunai face-to-face how you felt about him at Prachatai's 7th Anniversary party while thanking US State Department and convicted criminal Soros-funded Chiranuch for publishing all your work - what a tangled web we weave!!!
Pravit also attended - who admitted Prachatai was deleting comments per political-motivation, but has failed to publicly condemn them, and still freely associates with them...
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/01/us-funded-rights-advocate-censoring.html
And Sunai who is a "liar and hypocrite." Can't imagine what Prachatai, who regularly publishes your work, would be doing associating with either one of these men let alone making them "panelists" - unless of course you are all liars and hypocrites and simply can't get your serial lies to line up after all these years and under increasing scrutiny by REAL independent media.
Hey Spooner - did you know HRW has awarded Prachatai both cash and awards recently? And to my knowledge, Prachatai accepted these accolades gleefully.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/09/soros-funded-hrw-awards-soros-funded.html
Seems you either need to take back what you said about HRW, or publicly question and/or condemn Prachatai taking money, awards, and regularly associating with "coup supporting/collaborating" "hypocrites and liars." While you're at it, might as well condemn them for taking support from the mass murderers and corporate-fascists at the US NED.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/exposed-indy-newspaper-funded-by-us.html
You have a platform Spooner - time to see if you can back up your supposed convictions with action.
Oh no! Shock! Horror!
Oh no! Shock! Horror! Prachatai are open to the views of a rather wide range of political positions. Of course a propagandist for extremists wouldn't want anything like that!'
Congratulations to Prachatai!
Shame on you TC.
Wide range of views? That's
Wide range of views? That's funny. They are all funded by convicted criminal, Wall Street speculator George Soros - from Human Rights Watch which is funded by his "Open Society Institute," to Prachatai who receives millions from the degenerate banker, to Pravit himself who has several Soros-funded "fellowships" under his belt.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/08/exposed-indy-newspaper-funded-by-us.html
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2012/03/surpise-soros-is-convicted-criminal.html
When everyone is funded by the same organization, and that organization is run by a degenerate banker whose been convicted of fraud, then tried to invoke "human rights" to clear himself, and still had the ruling upheld against him by a European court, this is not considered a "wide range of views."
It is pretty clear the very opposite is true - they are utterly compromised and are functionaries of global financier capital - pretty much the antithesis of everything they fraudulently claim they are fighting for...
Prachatai, HRW, and Pravit are all frauds, hypocrites, liars, and ironically, all recipients of money from a convicted criminal's vast, ill gotten fortune.
Well yes, what you say is
Well yes, what you say is fully justified, but on the other hand, the above statement of position may signify a change in approach by HRW, a change that commentators have been urging for some time, and which would be welcome if long overdue.
Lets wait and see, if the prodigal son has finally sloughed off his cloak of stupidity, then this should surely be encouraged. On the other hand, it could just be a continuation of the mealy-mouthed hypocrisy that HRW (and particularly AI) are renowned for, in which case the decline in their credibility will doubtless continue.
Time will tell which it is.
@Andrew Spooner Are you so
@Andrew Spooner
Are you so sure it's hypocrisy?
HRW staff are still learning. As are many more. Probably including you.
I'm sorry but HRW makes no
I'm sorry but HRW makes no sense. Their OWN report admits that heavily armed militants were present from the start of the violence - in fact - were the ones that triggered it, yet the government should be charging soldiers? For what? For attempting to restore order and neutralize armed militants operating inside a heavily populated city? Even in their report when they claim soldiers fired on crowds, they described the crowds as "mostly unarmed" which is a euphemism for "ARMED."
Now if it is proven that the Army was negligent, or made poor decisions that led in unnecessary death - let's find out, and let's charge them for that.
And sorry Spooner but the despotism of Thaksin required the military - as is the duty of all armies around the world - to defend their nation against all enemies foreign and domestic. Removing Thaksin is akin to stopping Pol Pot or Hitler before their rise. Before they consolidated absolute power, had they been removed, there would have always been debates over whether it was premature or necessary. He was demonstratively consolidating unwarranted power by all accounts. That is dangerous and has opened doors to the darkest chapters in human history.
IMAGE: Thaksin, yesterday at the UDD rally - you know, the UDD that has nothing to do with him - according to Thida, who was also present....
That Thaksin is still indisputably leading the UDD & PTP after all of this time, and by his own mouth demanding the constitution be re-written, despite the daily dissembling by his propagandists, illustrates how dangerous he is and was. Each day that he refuses to allow Thailand to move on, vindicates the 2006 coup in spades.
Here's some more images from
Here's some more images from last night's cult of Thaksin gathering, shattering the myth by Thida, who was also present, that somehow this gaggle of horrifically exploited people is independent of Thaksin and the PTP party. They were, are, and always will be manipulated proxies of Thaksin & Co.
You all ought to hang your heads in shame for defending the exploitation of these people. They need education and jobs - and should be spending their weekend with their family and friends building their communities together, not being bussed into a city for the benefit of a mass-murdering billionaire working for Wall Street.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/06/corporate-funded-peoples-movement.html
Thanks to DNN, we can see what they're really saying about why they are out there, and the way they exploit these people's lack of information. It is a crime to exploit people's ignorance.