Is another oped about Thaksin imminent?
Over the last couple of weeks there has been a deluge of opeds in the English language Thai media and blogosphere on Thaksin Shinawatra. The Bangkok Post, the Nation and even Asian Correspondent’s very own Bangkok Pundit have repeatedly poured over every varied aspect of Thaksin's possible return in what only could be described, in a nod to film theory, as the “New Wave of Thaksin Fever”.
But, more importantly, is another oped about Thaksin imminent?
Here at AP (Asia Provocateur) we think it is. In fact it is a cast iron certainty.
Of course opeds regarding Abhisit lying to the Thai parliament about which nationality he used to enroll at Oxford University are not imminent. AP can also guarantee that there will be no opeds about the continued failure to hold the Abhisit government to account for the brutal massacre they unleashed on the Thai people in 2010. You will find no mention of this in the Thai English language media anywhere. The deaths of 90+ Thai civilians protesters is, quite frankly, an irrelevance.
Nor will there be any opeds about the recent release of an autopsy report which proved, beyond any reasonable doubt, that a hand-thrown fragmentation grenade that could have only been thrown by people close to them was used to kill the soldiers who stood next to Colonel Romklao on April 10th 2010 and not an M79 fired by the Red Shirts as is the lie put out by the previous “graceful” Abhisit government and their friends in the English-language Thai media/blogosphere/NGOs.
Of course there will be no mention or oped at all, anywhere, in English, about Romklao’s own body being immediately cremated after he was killed, before any autopsy could be carried out. That Romklao's death was then used as a pretext to slaughter 90+ civilians is just a moot point.
We can also forget any opeds at all on the subject of Human Rights Watch's lead researcher in Thailand, Sunai Phasuk, secretly supporting the 2006 illegal coup or that much of Thailand's human rights community is riddled with extreme rightwing PAD-supporters and is deeply politicised as a result.
The New Wave of Thaksin Fever provides a great distraction for the chattering classes but the obsession with him prevents any deeper analysis or more investigative journalism to emerge. It’s just a constant regurgitation of the same old theories, cut and pasted from the same old sources, inflected with the same old distortions.
Will Thaksin return? Maybe. Does it need discussing? Sure. But there is much more discussion to be had than just that.
Andrew Spooner can be followed on Twitter here and on Facebook here.



Comments
If Korn and Abhisit enroll at
If Korn and Abhisit enroll at Oxford as Brits, well maybe they were entitled to... but they registered to vote as Brits. I'm an American. I vote in America. My sweetheart's a Thai. She votes in Thailand.
Korn and Abhisit registered to vote in England. Presumably they did so ... why else register?
And then they held office in Thailand.
Yeah, Andrew, there are lots of things that need discussion. The Nullification of the Consequences of the 19 September 2006 Coup desperately needs discussion as the Coupsters and the relicts of their coup are railroading Somyos on charges of lese majeste as the ... English language Thai media and blogosphere ... bloviate on Thaksin.
They've been doing that for six years now.
I don't like Thaksin. If they hadn't thrown the coup in 2006 Thaksin would be retired by now. Instead ninety people were gunned down in the streets by 'their' government and the country has remained static in the face of change along every front. Real problems ... like rising sea levels, subsiding land, and other accompanying environmental changes affecting the capital, Central Thailand, and Thailand's absurdly sited manufacturing infrastructure ... and so many others must be addressed.
Having nothing positive to put forward the Anglophile Democrat Party of Thailand constantly casts about looking for a villain to castigate. Aristocrats are lazy so it's unsurprising, really, that they have settled these six long years on Thaksin. But negativity cannot pull them through, can surey not pull Thailand through. Yet they would rather the country sank into the Gulf of Thailand than that they lose control of Bangkok ... and their 'hinterland'.
You seem to be becoming a fixture here ... why not write a series of editorials on the real problems facing Thais and Thailand and possible solutions.
Certainly the rewrite of the constitution is important. The English language Thai media and blogosphere have published zero details of the Phuea Thai proposal, or of Weng's UDD proposal - the Nitirat is forgotten, they desperately hope ... the assignment is calling out to you.
JFL Would love to give those
JFL
Would love to give those subjects the time they deserve but nearly all of my Asian Correspondent/Prachatai contributions are unpaid. I need to eat so my time tends to be taken up with other work that pays.
But maybe, one day, I'll get around to it..
Thanks
JFL: as an American, you may
JFL: as an American, you may be misunderstanding the UK process of "registering to vote", as I believe yours is somewhat different.
In the UK, every household gets an annual form on which the "head of the household" is legally obliged to report everyone living there who is entitled to vote. It isn't an opt-in process and the people named don't have to be consulted, so passively being registered to vote can't in itself be interpreted as evidence of an intention to do so.
It definitely is different in
It definitely is different in the US. You must visit the registrar of voters, usually the County Clerk, and register yourself in order to be able to vote in elections. The trend was to make it easier when I lived there... since the decline of democracy in America began at the turn of the millennium... it's been getting harder and harder for all of us to vote in the US.
So who registered them? St. John's College? Are there records of who voted in elections in England? Can it be determined whether the two chums actually did vote? Amsterdam's an American as well, and the tone on his website seems to reflect our common (mis)understanding.
Thanks for the information.
As to who registered them,
As to who registered them, probably the college if they were living in college rooms, or the landlord of the house if they were living out of college.
There is no public record of who voted in British elections, so I don't think that question can be answered.
(There's a record of sorts: voters are ticked off on a list when they turn up to vote, and the numbers of their ballot papers are recorded. So votes aren't totally anonymous, but the list is sealed after the poll and can only be opened by court order if the vote is challenged. So in principle the information could have been extracted if you had a good enough reason for a court order, but it's too late now: I believe the documents are destroyed after one year.)
Richard H & JFL Yes, from
Richard H & JFL
Yes, from looking at the photos on Robert Amsterdam's blog it seems as though Korn and Abhisit were registered at Oxford Uni halls of residence at St Johns College.
However this means that Abhisit had to prove his British nationality to Oxford university in order for them to then pass his name onto the registration authorities as being eligible to vote. We can say with 100% certainty Abhisit used his British nationality to enrol at Oxford university. As he did this as a legal adult over the age of 18years this then means he exercised, in full, his British nationality.
This contradicts Abhisit's statements to parliament that whilst he might have acquired British nationality by birth it was something he'd never exercised, made use of or took advantage of. His statements to parliament made particular reference to his lack of usage of his British nationality when he applied to study at Oxford.
Quite clearly the factual evidence completely contradicts Abhisit's statements.
In short, he can't even tell the truth about his time at university never mind anything else.
Abhisit is a straight out, 100% liar. He's a perfect leader for the Democrat Party.
Quite clearly the factual
Yeah... but that's very frequently the case. His supporters don't care. And no one else 'matters' ... in the MSM or in 'elite' circles.
Abhisit is a lot like Ronald Reagan in this respect. A charming spokesman, in the eyes of his supporters, who elucidates their beliefs, which are then treated as fact and broadcast far and wide by the obedient/supportive MSM.
Reagan learned his trade in the second tier in Hollywood and then as a commercial shill on TV. Abhisit learned his in the PPE program at Oxford, apparently. Describes the respective sacred sources of faith and belief of our American middle class and the compradors of neoliberal empire in 'the colonies' pretty well, doncha think?