The Death of Shakespeare
The news that the film ‘Shakespeare Tong Tai’ (Shakespeare Must Die) has been banned by the censors comes as no surprise to teachers of English literature in the nation. They report an ever-growing list of censored works, and are often bewildered by the official reasons given for the bans.
‘Shakespeare Tong Tai’ is an adaptation of the famous Shakespearian tragedy ‘Macbeth’ and is set in a fictitious Asian country. Press reports say that a committee of the Ministry of Culture’s Office of Film and Video, headed by a Police Major General, refused to allow the film to appear on Thai screens, under the authority of the Film Act of 2008. Despite the fact that it was partly funded by the Ministry of Culture itself, the committee decided the film “undermines the unity of people in the country”.
The film’s producers have not, as far as I know, questioned the expertise of Police Major Generals in Shakespearian scholarship. Or in their understanding of “the unity of people in the country”. But this case has become one more example of a disturbing trend in Thai society of trying whitewash out of existence any hint of divisiveness or disunity.
The first sector to feel the effects was education. Schools and universities are becoming desperate to find any material that can avoid charges of promoting social disharmony.
“I’m surprised that the ‘Shakespeare Must Die’ people thought that they could get away with it,” said one Acharn who teaches English lit at a leading tertiary institution. “We had to get rid of all Shakespeare ages ago.
“Virtually every history play portrays a contested succession which the Ministry said was ‘unhelpful in the current context’. The tragedies also deal with conflict in various forms, be it revenge in ‘Hamlet’, jealousy in ‘Othello’, or sibling rivalry in ‘Lear’.”
The ban does have its supporters, though. “The students are all for it,” noted the Acharn. “They always found Shakespeare difficult.”
Novels and short stories have come under the same scrutiny with one misguided teacher actually threatened with prosecution under Article 112 of the Criminal Code. She foolishly included H G Wells’ short story ‘The Country of the Blind’ on a reading list. The authorities at her college went ballistic when they discovered the story contained the line: ‘In the Country of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King.’
It is not just at the top end of the educational pyramid that teachers are running into trouble. A primary teacher was flummoxed to find ‘Noddy Goes to Toyland’ on the banned list.
“The committee only read the first paragraph and promptly ordered all copies to be burned,” said the distraught teacher. “It reads ‘Big-Ears the brownie was hurrying through the woods on his little red bicycle, when he bumped into somebody.’
“They claimed it encouraged racial discord because the victim is brown, political polarization because of the reference to ‘red’ and road rage.”
Educationists had been hoping to rely on the Ministry of Culture for suitably anodyne texts, even if students found them crushingly tedious. But with the Ministry banning a work it had itself sponsored, they have had to be wary even of this source.
News media reporting has also been cramped by the insistence by the powers-that-be that any hint of disagreement must be excised. Reports of parliamentary debates have had to be cut, as has any and every announcement out of Democrat Party Headquarters.
“It’s just incessant whingeing,” noted one veteran reporter. “Pheu Thai couldn’t even take a shit without the Democrats complaining it was either too much, too little or the wrong colour.”
Other organs of state find themselves similarly constrained. The National Human Rights Commission has decided to amend its mission statement, which now declares that human rights will promoted and protected just as long as this doesn’t upset anybody. The Commission immediately felt it had to suspend all activities, though long-term observers failed to note much real change.
Traffic police are wondering if red lights discriminate in favour of vehicles allowed to proceed on green and are considering another attempt to speed up traffic flow by permanently switching all lights to green.
The National Election Commission decided that political campaigning in any form was almost certain to provoke arguments and issued a blanket ban. They have also proposed that ballot papers be banned for the same reasons as ‘Shakespeare Must Die’.
When questioned as to how democracy could survive in a system that prioritized unity above all other considerations, a respected senior statesman said that this was no problem for Thai-style democracy.
“When a true patriot has any doubt, they should simply agree with their superiors. In this way, Thai society will progress and prosper and anyone who says different is a traitor and will be shot at dawn,” he said harmoniously.



Comments
Shakespeare Must Die runs for
Censorship is dog bites man in Thailand. If something isn't censored it'd be news.
The news is that the Royal Thai Government routinely funds propaganda films at this scale... and so unsuccessfully. 178 minutes? 78 minutes too long. And if you're going to spend the money you borrowed to smash the opposition... you'd better have the gibe done and the gauntlet down before the you're defeated yourselves in the election you're 'theoretically' trying to win.
I say theoretically because there is always the air of 'real elite never win elections' to this cast of clowns. To the Democrats, winning an election would be like getting a good nights sleep atop 24 mattresses and down comforters... atop a single dried pea. A real 'elite' politician... a contradiction in terms... must complain of the bruise, and lose the election.
So all that Thai Khem Khaeng money was just going through the motions of buying votes. Here in Chiangrai they built a road that fell apart and had to patched before the election was even held. To 'paint the picture', as Voranai says they say.
" ‘In the Country of the
" ‘In the Country of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King.’"
Many a true word spoken in jest and fiction.
Still, I was heartened to see Manit (a co-producer of 'Shakespeare must die') quoted as follows in the Nation today: "Manit said one of the seven members of the Film Board insisted to him that the film had to be banned because Thais can't separate reality from fiction when they see a film." Says it all really, though he can't possibly be a proper Thai though... not with a brain thats actually capable of independent thought, nossir, no way. Probably got some farang hiding in his family tree.
One of the psychological problems caused to Thais by the incessant and unrelenting fiction used to portray the big family, as well as the long-time (and partially successful) attempt to impose uniformity on 65 million people, is that the boundary between reality and fantasy has become very blurred. The "culture" ministry and many parts of the bureaucracy in Thailand (including the Film Board), are infected with a very stupid and very dangerous hallucination and they appear to constantly compare reality with the picture of 'Thai-ness' they have in their heads, implanted there by decades of soporific palace propaganda. The picture is a confection, a fairy-tale for children and childish minds, but it is none-the-less the yardstick used by many Thai 'pooyays' to measure reality. It is in common and observable use by Prem and many of the other delusional but influential people in Thailand (either having been born to or having purchased that influence directly or indirectly under palace rules). Its also evident in the loopy buggers led by the even loopier Tul who appears to also believe that believes that a mass protest of 60 people impresses everyone.
The problem is that an inability to distinguish between reality and a persistent internal hallucination is called psychosis. Which is a mental illness. The problem is that as every psychologist and psychiatrist knows, the psychotic is generally unaware that he is unwell, or is able to 'explain' it in some way. In Thailand there is no shortage of very dim or very propagandised people who lap it all up with a spoon.
Interestingly, the incidence of psychological dysfunction or sub-normality is much greater among those parts of society where in-breeding is common. Check the European royal families for examples. Check the future king in UK. Mad as a hatter.