Chula lecturer says students have backers

Chulalongkorn political science lecturer dismisses what happened as petty nonsense, and believes that the students have someone behind them, while university administrators have refused to be interviewed.

Weerasak Krueathep, lecturer in political and administrative science, told Khaosod that the group of students entered the venue without identifying themselves.  He insisted that he did not seize [the placards from the students] violently, but just told them that they had to show them for him to see first, but the students did not comply. 

He said the students were dishonest for ‘not revealing themselves’, so he did not allow them to show the signs.

‘I asked them what the signs were about.  They didn’t answer.  As an organizer of the event, I could not let this happen.  And this is an academic event.  They came to the wrong place.  This is not a place for political activities.  I did what I did to ensure peace and order for everybody, not only for the Prime Minister.  If I am seen as restricting freedom, I’d like to ask whether these students were exercising their rights responsibly.  If they are responsible, they can show themselves and come to talk [to me].  I’m ready to apologize.  But if they don’t reveal themselves and stay underground, I’ll regard them as dishonest.  To exercise freedom without responsibility is not freedom.  I never thought of checking who they are because I’m not spiteful.  But I know that they have backers behind them,’ Weerasak said.

According to Krungthep Thurakij, Phattaranan Limudomporn, a 3rd-year student activist at the same Faculty, who was not part of the group of protesting students, said that the lecturer had overreacted.  As organizer, the lecturer should have provided space for the students to protest and display their placards peacefully.  If they had turned unruly or rude, he then could deal with them.  The Emergency Decree is already in place, Phattaranan said.

He agreed, however, with the obstruction of the female student by a university security guard to prevent her from reaching the Prime Minister in order to provide security for the country’s leader, as one cannot be sure who can be trusted.  Therefore, the security guard’s action was acceptable and reasonable, he said.

When he joined yellow-shirt PAD protests, their rights were also suppressed by the government.  So he knew the pain, and did not want to see that happen to anybody, no matter what colour of shirt. 

He said that the lecturer had been severely criticized on various websites, and he should explain things to the public, not just talk among his own colleagues that it is nothing or nonsense.

Phattaranan said that he was shocked by what he had read in the news which quoted the lecture as saying ‘This is not Chula here.  This is my place.  Sue me!’, though he was not sure if the lecturer had really said that.  He thought that this country had gone crazy, as this was Chulalongkorn University whose land had been royally granted [by Kings Rama V and VI], and did not belong to the lecturer.

Weerasak said to Krungthep Thurakij that it was petty nonsense.

M.R. Kalaya Tingsabhad, Chulalongkorn’s Deputy Rector, said that she had just heard the news, but did not yet have any information, so she refused to give an interview.

Charas Suwanmala, Dean of the Faculty of Political Science, also refused to give an interview, claiming that he was having class to teach.

A reporter from the evening news programme of Voice TV tried to reach Weerasak by phone for an interview, but was refused.  However, the TV station will send a reporter to the Faculty to ask for an interview again on 20 Aug.

Comments

PPT links to the ongoing

PPT links to the ongoing travails of Chulalongkorn University lecturer Suthachai Yimprasert :

Police want trials for two red-shirt supporters

Nang Lerng police Friday recommended trying a Chulalongkorn University lecturer and a red-shirt journalist on charges related to the violations of emergency rule.

In their report submitted for prosecution review, police said history lecturer Suthachai Yimprasert and journalist Somyos Prueksakasemsuk had violated the state of emergency by leading a public assembly of more than five people "with the aim to incite disturbances".

The incident happened on May 21 at the office of the Ban Lek Thi 111 Foundation, set up by 111 banned Thai Rak Thai Party executives. The two suspects are accused of trying to rally people to act in defiance of the authorities in the face of the violent end of the red-shirt rally, which took place on May 19.

So, yes. It is clearly not the case that all Chula lecturers are enforcers for The Regime.

But overall silence resounds from the academics at Chulalongkorn University.

Whether most are in agreement with The Regime or most are just keeping their heads down, the result is the same : Chulalongkorn University is stalwart in its support of The Regime.

Chulalongkorn University lecturer Suthachai Yimprasert is a rare, remarkable and endangered species at the "premier" educational institution in Thailand.

I think, again, you should

I think, again, you should never make generalisation that Chula is a hub for pro-government academics.

Let me point out a few individuals at Chula (at faculty of political science alone) who have remained critical of the Abhisit's regime that seems to overpass your radar:

1. Dr. Thitinan Pongsudhirak
2. Dr. Pitch Pongsawat
3. Dr. Puangthong Pawakapan
4. Kanokrat Lertchoosakul
5. Prabhas Pintobtang

etc... etc...

Some of names above are also a part of Santi Prachatam (Peace and Justice network), which consisted of 155 pro-democracy/ pro-election academic.

http://ruleoflawthailand.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/ruleoflaw/

Thanks for the list and the

Thanks for the list and the links. However, as this article shows, the public persona of Chulalongkorn University is supportive of The Regime.

Why were there only a handful of students there to remind Abhisit of his own words spoken on behalf of the PAD, contradicted by his actions in the case of the UDD? Why was there not one faculty member there in support of the students? Why was Weerasak Krueathep allowed to bully the few, brave students who did show up, bereft of any faculty support whatsoever?

I understand that its tough to make a baht and we all have to go along to get along... but a university which aspires to the first rank must have a first rank faculty.

Where is the leadership going to come from in Thailand? From the military? From the political class? From the academics? From among the ordinary people... the "rural hordes"?

I hope its going to come from the rural red hordes. It's not coming from anywhere else.

Chulalongkorn is not alone, of course. John Choon Yoo, the resident casuist at UC Berkeley, another university formerly of the first rank, absolved American political criminals of crimes every bit as serious as the crimes of Abhisit and Suthep, crimes with quantitatively more serious consequences to be sure.

PPT links to a treasure trove of Bulletins of Concerned Asian Scholars. The first one I've read details the sell-out of American political scientists to the US Vietnam war effort and of the murderous consequences that sell-out had for people right here in Thailand (Subcontracting Counterinsurgency: Academics in Thailand 1954-1970 Vol. 3, No. 2).

But its not about the crimes of others in any case, it's always about our own, and I fear that Chulalongkorn will be wearing its own silence in the face of authoritarian massacre and usurpation around its neck, like the mariner's albatross, for years and years to come.

"This is not a place for

"This is not a place for political activities." ??? It was a function organized by the Political Science Department of Chulalongkorn University. I'm don't know what courses Weerasak lectures in at CU but I bet none of them have anything to do with democracy.

Like Weerasak Krueathep,

Like Weerasak Krueathep, there seem to be a number of Thai "intellectuals"/academic/writer/journalists who consciously and actively write, campaign and organize against so-called "democracy" and "democratic principles/systems/methods", finding the China system of overt central elite command and control more attractive and effective.

Unfortunately for Thailand, whereas many of the present China government elite are very highly educated, above-average intelligent and at least partially dedicated to improving the China standard of living and structure, the so-called "Elite' in Thailand seem much primarily interested in simply grabbing as much wealth and personal material benefits as possible and not giving a rat's ass about improving the overall standard of living and structure for the rest of Thailand's citizens, particularly those with darker skin who perform manual labor, whether in factories or on farms, and who live outside of central Bangkok.

Sorry... I just cannot buy

Sorry... I just cannot buy this Chinese Fascism is "good fascism" routine.

Their wild exploitation and pollution of the environment, their abandonment of the one child program, the very great amount of corruption among party boss ranks... a rising tide of pollution lifts all hulls I suppose, but China and the world will pay for their wild 19th century industrial spree.