Saturday, 20 March 2010

Locals against weir project in Ping River under Strong Thailand scheme

Residents of Mae Soi, Chom Thong district, Chiang Mai, are opposed to a Provincial Irrigation Office plan to build a weir across the Ping River, for fear of losing their homes and livelihoods as a result of the weir.

According to the Chiang Mai Provincial Irrigation Office, the project developer, the weir is supposed to ease water shortage problems in the Upper Ping River.  The budget under the government’s Strong Thailand (Thai Khem Kaeng) scheme amounts to 965.974 million baht, including 850.24 million baht for construction of the weir, embankment and facilities, 48.48 million baht as compensation for land and assets, and 67.25 million baht for mitigation of environmental impacts.

The project claims to provide water for an area of about 80,000 rai (32,000 acres) in Mae Soi and Ban Pae Subdistricts of Chom Thong District and Nong Pla Sawai Subdistrict, Ban Hong District, Lamphun Province.

However, local people at Mae Soi where weir will be built said that the project was imposed on them without their consent, and they had been inadequately informed by the authorities.

Early this year, after they heard about the project, one of them made a phone call to the Irrigation Office to ask about it.  An engineer in charge of the project told them that this was a Royal Project, claiming that some villagers had petitioned HM the Queen and the project had already been approved by local communities.

But how come the local people had hardly been aware about it, they puzzled.

‘That made villagers dare not speak, as it was claimed to be a Royal Project,’ one villager said.

They found from project documents that the authorities had obtained ‘consent’ by having local leaders raise their hands in meetings.  Some people in nearby villages told them that the authorities had had them sign papers, and only afterwards did they know that they had signed to support the project.  

In March, Suwit Namthep, representing the villagers, submitted a petition against the project to the Mae Soi Tambon Administrative Organization and Chom Thong District Chief.

Later, officials from the Irrigation Office came to meet the villagers.  According to the villagers, while the officials spoke only about the good points of the project, one of them said that if Ban Mae Soi had to be submerged, that would be a sacrifice of Ban Mae Soi.

In early November, a group of villagers from Mae Soi went on a study trip to visit local people who had been affected by similar projects, including Rasi Salai and Hua Na dams in Sri Sa Ket in the Northeast.


Wenika Khamyong

Wenika Khamyong, who was on the trip, said that she was shocked when she saw with her own eyes the inundated farmland and homes of people there.

She said that the weir project would submerge many villages near the Ping River.

As is always the case with development projects, this project has resulted in rifts among local people, especially between dissenting villagers and local leaders who lean on the side of the authorities.

Some months ago, local leaders sought to collect villagers’ signatures to support the project, pressuring those who were opposed by saying that they would be excluded from public services such as funeral funds and pumped water supply [for agriculture], said one villager.

Hannarong Yaowalert, member of the National Economic and Social Advisory Council, said that the villagers had been provided with too little information regarding the impacts of the project.  He was concerned that the embankments would block the flow of water from both sides of the river, causing floods.

And villagers who catch fish in the river would find it difficult to continue to do so as the water would be too deep, he said. 


Hannarong Yaowalert

Comments

However, local people at Mae

However, local people at Mae Soi where weir will be built said that the project was imposed on them without their consent, and they had been inadequately informed by the authorities.

Question :
What's the difference between Thailand, occupied by an army of grifters, grafters, and bureaucrats from Bangkok with a "real" army to back them up and say, Iraq, occupied by an army from the United States of America?
Answer :
They speak a very closely related language in Bangkok, and could actually communicate with the occupied peoples of Thailand... if they wanted to.

To the pirates and compradors

To the pirates and compradors in the City of Angels:

The Extinct Traders
By GREG KEELER

They should stand in a river, the makers of laws,
wars and money. They should feel the dark
molecules turn in their sockets of stone. Their flaws
should be transparent, their flesh should stand in stark
contrast to the mud, roots and leaves of the pools.
The builders of dams, weapons, and walls should stand
among the herons, holding their obsolete tools
above the current, talismans in a grand
gesture for the inspection of gnats. Let
these plastic fossils become a gaudy clock
to gauge the decline of freedom, the rise of debt
among the extinct traders in water and rock.
Let them hold their precious commodities forever.
Let them weather. Let them stand in a river.

I worked in the Mae Sooy area

I worked in the Mae Sooy area from 1985-2003. I know the villages and people well. Did you know that in 1992 8 out of 16 villages in the Tambol Mae Sooy voted to become no-bribe zones during elections. They refused to take money in exchange for their votes. These people are politically savvy and are farmers. The fact that they were not aware of this project is not surprising. The possibility that their leaders raised hands at meetings to approve this weir should have some documentation somewhere. If not, then the politicians involved have alot to answer for and mere excuses without proof will not suffice. No evidence, no project.

At the same time, for these people to be offered money for their land is an effective way to silence poor farmers. In fact, the economic and environmental impact on the Mae Ping River system would essentially destroy what little life is left in it. In the past they organized to provide an economic safety net for those extremely vulnerable families who stood to lose should certain projects not go through. We sat with them and looked for alternatives. I hope they will find their way through this again.

This page was indexed by

This page was indexed by Google and added to blogs search 2 Feb 2009 9:15:31 GMT.

Google cache: http://google.com/search?q=cache:www.prachatai.com/english/node/1522&ei=AFQjCNHajN_OX0kgxzx7UGA1yBfsEX VIds_dfWq

Webroot informer.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Comments are limited to a maximum of 2500 characters.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.