Da Torpedo’s lawyer has submitted complaints to the Corrections Department, asking for an explanation of what he alleged as discrimination against his client, including putting her in solitary confinement as a punishment and labeling her as a lèse majesté convict. He also suspected warders of eavesdropping on his talks with his client, and prying into confidential documents.
On 11 Sept, Prawase Praphanukul, lawyer for Daranee Charnchoengsilpakul, submitted the complaints in four separate letters, dated 9 Sept, to the Director-General of the Corrections Department, Nathee Chitsawang.
According to the lawyer, he visited Daranee in the Central Womens Prison on 9 Sept, and found that she had been put in solitary detention as a disciplinary punishment. He wanted the department to clarify on what grounds and under what law or regulation Daranee had been punished.
The prison has issued Daranee a new nametag which identifies her as a lèse majesté convict. Prawase said it exposed Daranee to hatred from her fellow inmates and warders. The prison’s practice of having inmates wear different uniforms according to the severity of their punishment amounts to discrimination.
The lawyer went on to complain that during his visit on that same day he went out to make photocopies and when he returned to give the documents to Daranee, he heard some officials criticizing part of the conversation he had had with his client.
He said that lawyers and clients had the right to confidentiality, and according to the law, information exchanged between them was considered privileged. He raised the question as to how his conversation with his client through a phone line inside the room could be heard by officials.
Prawase said that on 15 June he had sent documents, including three CDs, for Daranee to verify, but the prison had not allowed Daranee to open the CDs to verify the information and had not told him so. He had reasons to believe that someone had opened the CDs, which is a criminal offence. As yet, the CDs have not been returned to him.
Comments
...she had been put in
...she had been put in solitary detention as a disciplinary punishment. He wanted the department to clarify on what grounds and under what law or regulation Daranee had been punished...
They don't need no stinkin' badges!
The prison has issued Daranee a new nametag which identifies her as a lèse majesté convict.
A six-pointed star by chance?
...he heard some officials criticizing part of the conversation he had had with his client.
He said that lawyers and clients had the right to confidentiality, and according to the law, information exchanged between them was considered privileged...
"National security". When national security is at risk no one has any rights. Everyone is lucky if they are allowed to live. Says so right in the constitution of 2007. About a million times. And the "authorities"... that'd be the military... are in charge of judging when "national security" is at risk.
Prawase said that on 15 June he had sent documents, including three CDs, for Daranee to verify, but the prison had not allowed Daranee to open the CDs to verify the information and had not told him so. He had reasons to believe that someone had opened the CDs, which is a criminal offence.
Charging those self-empowered to protect "national security" with a criminal offense is itself a criminal offense.
Since they'd rather not touch Prawase, yet, they'll take it out on Daranee.
Is this not to protect her
Is this not to protect her from the hostility of other inmates? I think after the dust settled, the correction department will give her more normal treatment. They just don't want troubles among their inmates, I guess.
...a new nametag which
...a new nametag which identifies her as a lèse majesté convict...
Silly me... I thought that was to encourage them to hate her as the enemy of what all Thais, criminals and non, are united in love of.
Yes, surely you're right. It is only Daranee's safety and welfare that the authorities are concerned with. It is because the other prisoners hate her so, or so some of them do, and for reasons "inexplicable" to the authorities, that they "are forced" to put Daranee in the hole. "For her own good." Why they've the milk of human kindness by the quart in every vein! They do.
JFL, no I don't think so.
JFL, no I don't think so. They just don't want to have troubles. If Daa should get hurt by her inmates, what's going to happen? What kind of accusation will her supporters throw at the corrections department? They are bureaucrats so they don't want to take any risk. A typical bureaucrat's way of thingking.
Plaadip, I'd love to believe
Plaadip, I'd love to believe you, but unfortunately I think JFL has more of a grip on the situation than you. It's very clear they are breaking the law, & possibly trying to set her up as a scapegoat. You write as though these people are law-abiding, reasonable, even ethical. Whatever gave you that idea? Come out of your burrow!
Michael, I don't believe
Michael, I don't believe that "name tug" stuff. This is my hunch. Let's wait and see if it will turn out to be true. I just don't think that they are so deligent to do something that could cause more trouble for them.
"name tag" correction.
"name tag" correction.
The one unusual impression
The one unusual impression I'm always struck by with the Bangkok "elite" is the way they take things personally, every threat to their rule is not only a threat to "national security", as most authoritarian governments are content with just such a pretext for their oppression, but a personal affront to themselves, which must be dealt with on a personal level.
The person who dared, yes dared!, to oppose them must be crushed. Made an example of for all to see. And their own ruthlessness displayed, the very gods and decency outraged to prove their impious omnipotence.
I cannot forget, and I will not let you forget, the brutal murder of Phra Supoj Suvacano on 17 June, 2005 at the Mettadhamma Forest Dhamma Center in Amphoe Fang. A blameless man, heir to Buddadassa Bhikku of Suan Mok, protector of the lands bequeathed to the Dhamma Center in trust for the villagers. The thugs, attached to a "national politician", brutally murdered him for daring to stand between them and "their" land, for all of Thailand is theirs for the taking, an example of their impiety and disdain for all the things holy to Thais and to all humans alike. The Dhamma Center pled for the MSM to keep the story alive, to give it legs, to walk after the slayers of the blameless Phra. Silence. Nothing. They spit in the face in the face of the Buddha himself and dare anyone to do anything about it.
There must be very few of these Godfathers of the Bangkok "elite". And they are another breed. A breed vanished from such a central position in most societies, banished to the triads and gangs, but firmly ensconced here in Thailand. Spitting in the face of the country's citizens and daring them to do something about it.
Do the powers that be think
Do the powers that be think they are abusing this poor woman and getting away with it? Thailand be ashamed you are a world disgrace just the same as Burma!What kind of revered 'Supreme Being' permits such Nazi behaviour? Ergo he is not great or virtuous QED
Not to stir the pot, but the
Not to stir the pot, but the elites are all over the place, not just in Bangkok. Elites populate social and career relationships, family relationships and criminal relationships, as well as others. This is a bit of a global phenomenon but in Thailand has been made into an illusory science.
Regarding Da, she is getting shafted by 'the system' and those who benefit from it. If ever there was a case to be made for denouncing barbarianism, this has got to be at the fore of a litany of such abuses.
What kind of a small person are you that you can't take verbal insults? Further, what kind of person are you to take perceived insults against others and parade them in court as threats to national security? Does not tolerance, compassion, mercy, common sense and the difference from good and evil penetrate your skull?
It seems that not one head has rolled to date over this Khao Phra Vihean situation, although on the basis of national security it has to surpass Da's alleged offenses. But I guess allowing Thai land to slip over to the hands of 'friendly neighboring countries' is by definition not a national security threat...But to me, a foreigner who does not understand Thais, I kind of suspect that the sisaket fiasco eclipses the one that occurred at the Sanam Luang soapbox back then.
I guess allowing Thai land to
I guess allowing Thai land to slip over to the hands of 'friendly neighboring countries' is by definition not a national security threat...
Frank, you're a PAD man, playing the fraudulent "national security" card yourself!?
Post new comment