The Ministry of Science and Technology will set a standard for authentic Thai dogs, using Khun Thong Daeng as a reference, to protect them and prevent foreigners from claiming patents. Thai buffaloes will also be standardized for conservation.
On July 1, Science and Technology Minister Khunying Kalaya Sophonpanich said that the Ministry of Science and Technology was trying to follow His Majesty the King’s advice given when Ministry officials were granted an audience on June 24 at the Klai Kangwon Palace in Prachuab Khiri Khan to report on the patenting of the aroma-control gene in rice.
HM spoke about the standardization of Thai dogs, and, citing his pet dog Khun Thong Daeng as a reference, said that the characteristics of Thai dogs included medium size, coiled tails, prick ears, and loyalty to their owners, Kalaya said.
‘Initially, the Ministry will follow HM’s advice using Khun Thong Daeng as a prototype of authentic Thai dogs for the purpose of conserving the authentic Thai breed and preventing them from disappearing from the country. The number of authentic Thai dogs has decreased because people prefer foreign breeds,’ the Minister said.
Kalaya has assigned the task to the National Electronics and Computer Technology Centre (NECTEC) which has conducted a study of the body size of Thai people, or Size Thailand Project, using a technology called 3-D Body Scanning. NECTEC will collect data on all authentic Thai dogs, and work with academic experts to find the specifications of authentic Thai dogs, with Khun Thong Daeng as the reference.
'Afterwards, the ministry will report to HM on implementation, and will register the standard size of Thai dogs under the Geographical Identification Law to protect the Thai breed. This is similar to patenting a product, but the patenting of life forms, including animals is not allowed. But the law can protect Thai dogs to prevent other countries from claiming Thai dogs as theirs, as has happened with Thai rice, plants and products which were patented by foreigners. Although they are Thai, Thai people are robbed of the ownership. It’s a pain for the nation,’ Kalaya said.
Kalaya said that HM also asked about the standardization of other Thai animals, including buffaloes in particular. HM was worried that Thai buffaloes were on the brink of extinction, despite the fact that farmers and buffaloes have had a long relationship since ancient days. Ministry officials informed HM that the Ministry was implementing a project as Her Royal Highness Princess Sirinthorn had told the Ministry to do so, for fear of extinction. The Ministry has assigned Chularat Tanprasert, a researcher in Size Thailand Project, to conduct a study with the Department of Livestock Development, with the results expected in the next two months.
‘HRH Princess Sirinthorn is worried about the farmers’ way of life, and doesn’t want farmers to use chemicals or machines too much, or they will get poorer and poorer. [HRH] wishes them to live as farmers, having a sufficiency way of life. The standardization of buffalo size is for the purpose of conservation and building knowledge for later generations before buffaloes disappear,’ Kalaya said.
Researcher Chularat said that a scanning machine for buffaloes was being built with a budget of about 500,000 baht. The machine is a bigger version of the 3-D Body Scanner which was used for Thai people, and is expected to be finished in 1-2 months. Then she will work with the Department to collect buffaloes from across the country to be scanned.
Source:
http://www.matichon.co.th/matichon/view_news.php?newsid=01p0112020752§ionid=0101&day=2009-07-02
Comments
"characteristics of Thai dogs
"characteristics of Thai dogs included medium size, coiled tails, prick ears, and loyalty to their owners"
ROFLMAO
Can I add some other characteristics such as:
- Likes roaming soi's & sleeping in restaurants:)
I expect the international brand name labels, movie & music industries will welcome Thailand's renewed enthusiasm for patents & trade marks:)
As soon as Thai dogs get the
As soon as Thai dogs get the patent, there will be some counterfeit ones available at the JJ market soon enough. : )
BTW, what's the point of patenting Thai dogs? Is there any genetic identification to confirm? Is it possible to get patent on the naturally existing living creatures?
Any way, all of my dogs were 'picked up' from sides of the roads, out of my pity, sympathy. Some got serious injuries(from traffics I guess), when I first encountered them, and took them home. So I'm sure all my dogs are 'midroad', and I found out later that most of them are 'cute' just the way they are. Never care whether they are called Thai dogs or something else, they are sure parts of my noisy little house I call home.
......the model for the
......the model for the prototype Thai dog is actually Bangkok Soi Dog Number One, the Boss of all the Bangkok soi dogs.............
......every morning he wakes up on the street, surrounded by his pack......he's got no clothing, no bank account, no credit cards, no car, motorcycle, no nothing......but he wakes up happy, wagging his tail, wanders over for some scraps from the garbage bin at the back of a Gay Karaoke Bar, drinks a little water from a mud puddle, then looks for sex.........if all the bitches are still asleep, he humps a hole in the street and settles down for a daytime nap in the midst of the traffic, happy to be Bangkok Soi Dog Number One.....................
http://chriscolesgallery.com/soi_dogs_bangkok.htm
I don't know the intention of
I don't know the intention of Prachatai to carry this news. But this is for your information from a British site about Thai Ridgeback Dog.(TRD)
************************************************************************
Throughout history man has endeavoured to cross breeds of dogs in order to produce variety. The Thai Ridgeback is an exception. This breed has remained unchanged for centuries. The Thai Ridgeback is possibly one of the oldest recorded purebreed dogs.
With their striking appearance, unique coat and their cat-like agility they are really something special.We are fortunate enough to have the first of these rare and beautiful creatures in the United Kingdom.We would like to take this opportunity to introduce you to this distinguished breed.
http://www.thairidgeback.co.uk/home.htm
*************************************************************************
You will find so many sites of TRD lovers & breeders if you surf the internet.
Thong Deng is a TRD.
As a dog lover, I see no harm
As a dog lover, I see no harm in treating her as a prototype of Thai dogs. If I were to keep a dog, i would prefer Thai dogs rather than those expensive breeds so many wealthy Thais love to have as their pets (perhaps as a way to enhance their social status??). A foreign friend of mine complains abt Thai dogs roaming everywhere even in restaurants... while I could see his point, I think it;s difficult to improve Thai (esp stray) dogs' living condition as long as Thai people still value foreign breeds more than the local ones...so having Tongdang standardized as Thai dog sounds good to me.. ( I don't want to comment on the political implication of this).
Correction. Thong Deng is not
Correction. Thong Deng is not a Thai Ridgeback Dog. According to His Majesty, it's similar to basenji. Sorry!!
Is this article satire or for
Is this article satire or for real?
A dog found wandering around in a mixed stray pack is to become a purebread protoype, while a pure bred protoype that already exists, called the ridge back already, is virtually ignored? I think there is a higher allegory at work here in this story, about the "loyalty to its owner" part.
Anyway, I hope the Thai people dont have to eat Farang rice and keep Farang dogs. That would be a sad thing wouldn't it? Thai dogs for Thai people!
Anyway, anybody see TD lately?
I find the obsession with
I find the obsession with 'pure breed' a bit wierd. What's wrong with hybrid breeds? They are still Thai dogs if they live in Thailand! I mean if no one imports them, they should be seen as Thai dogs although their parents might be from overseas. Thongdang is a real Thai dog because she was born in Thailand .It is as simple as that (although I have to say i find the 'loyalty to the owner' bit condescending. How abt we change this to "love the owner as long as the owner is sensible, kind, caring and not selfish?? Love should be two-way communication/reponse. We can't expect love and loyalty if we can;t give it to others '
Correction: In my opinion, TD
Correction: In my opinion, TD should be seen as a real Thai dog because she was born in Thailand, has spent all or most of her life here, and sees herself as a Thai dog. Whether some of her ancestors could be foreign dog or not does not really matter. Hybridity is a good thing! Overly concern abt 'purity' or 'pure breed' is just nonsensical IMO.
I am a proud owner of a copy
I am a proud owner of a copy of the Tong Daeng book. Unfortunately it's not here with me now, but in Italy, so I can't check. If I remember well, the book says that Tong Daeng is a hybrid, not a pure breed dog. The book says something similar to what Joy states when she writes: "TD should be seen as a real Thai dog because she was born in Thailand, has spent all or most of her life here, and sees herself as a Thai dog". I liked the book, because of its hidden meaning (or at least the meaning I thought I found between the lines): it doesn't matter how humble one's origins are, one can be very smart and achieve a lot of things.
This said, I want to add
This said, I want to add that, although I love all animals including dogs, I am 100% a cat person. Cats are cool, independent and free, dogs are lovely but hopelessly subjugated to humans (the Earth's evil breed): I feel for them.
So we should eat Thai dog
So we should eat Thai dog with Thai Rice?
Yeah, i reckon I agree with u
Yeah, i reckon I agree with u , Alex. Cat is cool and inpendent-- that ;s the perfect image may people want themselve to be (me included).But I have heard some people say cats do not love anyone . I don't think its true. sometimes being independent maybe mistaken for being uncaring. But it is still better than being hooked up with one or another form of attachment all the time because it won't allow u to be complete on yr own. Sorry off -topic comment again!! It has been raining all day! Not sure if anyone has read Hemmingway's 'Cat in the Rain'..but 'cat' in this story does not seem to be very independent (although in reality they are).
All some human beings want
All some human beings want to do seems to be to eat eat and eat......
I admit i also have the tendency to eat too much
Joy, are you sure it's
Joy, are you sure it's off-topic? I think yours are very political statements. :)
The cats where I live might
The cats where I live might be 'cool, independent & free' but they are such a blight on the environment & neighbourhood that the local municipal authority is intruducing compulsory registration of all cats, and I understand it also includes some rules about desexing (I'm not a cat owner so I have not researched the rules fully, but I think its long overdue that some rules were put in place)
The cats in my neighbourhood kill the native birds & animals, but seem useless at catching mice, and they just treat the whole area as one big toilet.
I think Joy is right about cats being uncaring - they seem to be the 'love em & leave em' type happy enough to use someone to stroke them & make them purr, but with no real loyalty to anyone or anything but themselves.
Maybe Italian dogs are different to Aussie dogs - we see dogs as our best mate in Australia, and subjugation is an alien concept in Aussie mateship :)
Back on topic: So is there anything worth patenting about Tong Daeng or not?
WOW!! Hobby, I'm speechless
WOW!! Hobby, I'm speechless after reading yr post today hehehe:-)I need to spend some mins composing my thoughts before responding to yr post...
I think I'm talking abt the image of cat (in human imagination) rather than cats in real life. I admit cats in real life have some flaws (although some cats are really well-behaved).
I quote : "..type happy enough to use someone to stroke them & make them purr, but with no real loyalty to anyone or anything but themselves.
I don't think cat lacks loyalty. They just do not want to be attached to humans/their peers too much IMO. Cats have selfish side too but so are all living beings. Some dogs are not that loyal too. I think cats do care, but perhaps they love to be alone more than dogs??
The concept of Australian mateship?Umm.. I've read some Henry Lawson stories and i think they talk a lot abt mateship..sounds like a great concept to me but i heard that it can exclude/discriminate against people of different skin colours and gender preferences :-)
Hobby, ok, maybe in Australia
Hobby, ok, maybe in Australia you need to start some re-education programme for your cats. I am sorry, though, it won't work. They'll keep behaving their way, using your clean streets as their personal toilets, feeling quite happy about it. Face it. Maybe you could exterminate them all, to solve the problem. That is, if you think it's a good idea.
About Italian dogs: yes, they're different. They carry guns and kill people, occasionally acting as hitmen (oops, hitdogs). Italian dogs are mafiosi, and of course so are Italians, which explains precisely why we like to keep our dogs subjugated.
Alex, I agree re-education
Alex, I agree re-education will not work, and I think the new rules are actually designed to reduce the existing levels of extermination - unless of course you also consider 'family planning' a form of extermination?
Joy, I like cats & dogs - I just choose not to own either.
On mateship, I think its a misunderstood concept, and I also dont think it is exclusively Australian, nor even exclusively gender specific - but that just my opinion, and I can accept that others see it differently.
PS, I'm sorry to hear Italian
PS, I'm sorry to hear Italian dogs are like that - perhaps they are the ones in need of a re-education programme?
From my experience the Thai dogs are similar to Australian dogs, but perhaps I am missing something about why they are worth patenting.
The only noticable differences are they have different diets, and the thai dogs seem to have freedom to go anywhere, anytime, and are perhaps in a way they are even more free than their human 'subjugators'.
I still dont think, in general, that Aussie dogs are subjugated, but accept that there are exceptions to any rule.
Hobby, in case you haven't
Hobby, in case you haven't noticed, my comment wasn't directed at the "new regulations" in Australia, but at you. When you write that cats in your neighbourhood kill birds and other animals but do not do their "job" (i.e. killing mice), pardon me, you sound like you expect animals to behave in a certain way because we humans decided so. I am neither defending the Thai approach (dogs are free, but as a matter of fact they're all sick) nor the Western model (dogs are just NOT allowed to be free at all, especially in urban areas - the ones who escape get captured and jailed - but they're normally quite healthy). Dogs represent a potential danger to humans because they're biggish and could bite or even kill sometimes. Cats are way too small, and are no harm to us. Moreover, cats duly bury their droppings, so I can't really imagine how cats can turn your neighbourhood into a big toilet.
I am glad you wrote more about your definition of mateship though, as the first version sounded a little disturbing to me.
Alex, there may have been
Alex, there may have been some misunderstanding:- I did not say cats do any real harm to humans, but they do indeed do real harm to native animals & birds in my region - by real harm, I mean they kill them and from what I have observed they are not even doing it for survival (food) purposes as they usually dont even eat their prey.
So if they want to kill something for fun, I would much prefer they killed mice, or preferably mosquito's.
'you sound like you expect animals to behave in a certain way because we humans decided so'
It is my understanding that humans introduced cats to Australia, so perhaps its not unreasonable to expect humans to take some responsibility for trying to control the native animal & bird killing habits of cats in our region?
Obviously you are a cat lover, whereas I try to love all creatures equally (except for the odd mosquito, spider or snake:)
Interesting arguments from
Interesting arguments from both Alex and Hobby although I tend to like Alex's argument more.:-)
Hobby: yeah, cats kill for
Hobby: yeah, cats kill for fun, it's true. And they kill rats and mice for fun only when they like it. Dogs kill cats for fun too, they don't eat them. It's disturbing for us to see a dog killing a cat just for the sake of it and a cat killing a cute bird without any intention to eat them. But if you pay attention, both cats and dogs normally do it for us. Both dogs and cats feel they should give us a present from time to time, but they don't fully understand our concept of "present", so they give us what they think it's cool to give. I had both dogs and cats (I love cats, but as I said I love dogs too), and I remember how some of them used to leave these grotesque gifts by the house's door. I don't think humans are particularly bad with dogs. In fact, dogs are almost universally considered man's best friends. The problem is that dogs get so attached to their "owners" (I'm using the legal term here) that they get depressed (some breeds even suicidal) when their human companion leaves for a while, or dies. Of course that's a beautiful thing, that really makes me love dogs, but as I said, I feel for them, because many owners just don't deserve that. Cats match my idea of human-animal relationship: they live with us, eat our food, show their love in their own particular way (some cats can be just as affectionate and loyal as dogs, believe me), but in the end they retain a lifestyle of freedom and keep living like the hunters they are. Hobby, I am not a cat-lover, I am an animal rights advocate. But the fact that I'm vegetarian, for example, doesn't make me think that my cat (or you, for that sake) should be too. I just do what I think is right, and expect people to act using common sense. Cats, like many other animals, were introduced to Australia by humans, and you're right when you say that humans are supposed to take their responsibilities, as I doubt cats ever asked for it. Just don't expect them to change behaviour, though. And believe me: no species would face extinction because of cats or dogs, I am quite confident in saying this. To end this long post: the reason why I got so heated up is that your logics reminded me about the ones used by a friend's neighbour, when he was asked to explain why he poisoned my friend's 2 cats.
Joy: thank you, you just won... a cat :)
Alex, interesting stuff - I'm
Alex, interesting stuff - I'm not sure exactly what we are arguing about (if we are arguing?) and I can assure I have dfficulty killing an ant (can only do it if I dont get the chance to think about it first), and I would never poison anyone's cat (even though I admit I have felt like doing it during a period when my place became the local cat toilet - fortunately they now must have found another toilet, or perhaps their behaviour has changed and they have improved their disposal methods:)
I admire your stance regarding vegetarianism and animal rights.
I choose not to own any animals, mainly because I am very aware of the responsibility. Also, FWIW, I have been pescatarian for over 20 years, but have not made the full move to vegetarianisim, or even better veganism, because it would have made things too difficult in the household - the step to pescatarian was extreme enough in the view of my partner!
Joy, please try to take full responsibity for your cat :)
Pescatarian, veganism.
Pescatarian, veganism. Interesting words that I did not know. (Now I know the meanings after consulted a dictionary.) Before the meiji revolution (1986), almost all Japanese were pescatarians. I think it's the healthiest life style if you don't eat too much fat tuna.
In Bangkok, they fixed a lot of stray dogs as a masesure to control the numbers. The dogs caught for the operation also received immunization shots to protect them from rabies. The idea comes from Budhist philosophy. Unkindest cuts for them may be a good idea if the problem is being caused by stray cats.
Correction, again. 1868 not,
Correction, again. 1868 not, 1986. Sorry as always. What I ment is that just one century ago(not 30 years ago) there was a country where Pescatarian was vast majority. How fast our lifestyle has changed! And now most Japanese including me don't know how to descrive our past eating behavior, and even feel that Pescatarian is a odd word descriving a strange human behavior.
Somsak, What is
Somsak,
What is "pescatarian" ?? I read Hobby and Alex' posts and try to look up the definition of 'pescatarian' from my dictionary but can;t find it.
We have on-going drizzle here for a few days now!!
BTW, somsak have u noticed that Pravit is leaving for the US on scholarship /followship? I hope he continues to contribute to Prachatai. His writing is always very interesting and thought=provoking.
BTW., Alex thanks for the cat:-). Hobby, i think having a cat is a big responsibility.. but I will look at it this way: the cat needs to take care of itself as well. Both me and the cat should have equal responsibility for each other. We will try to give equal time for ourselves and for being together. The cat should not be made to make all the sacrifice and vice versa.:-)
Somsak, I think alot of
Somsak,
I think alot of Japanese food is very healthy. My Japanese friend used to cook Miso soup for me and i think it is superb! (in taste and benefits for health). I suppose fish are rice are still the mainstay diet of most Japanese who are health-concious???
I also feel the Japanese prefer their dogs to be extremely well-behaved and clean ?? Once we lived in a homestay with an Aussie couple and their dog. The couple tend to spoil their dog and adore it too much. They let him (the dog)sleep in their bedroom and make a mess in the kitchen. Because we and my Japanese friend share their kitchen, we were not so happy with this but we couldn;t do much bec we were simply lodgers (although of course we like the dog very very much as well although it would be better if the dog were better house-trained)
When animals are very
When animals are very dependent on their human companions, they tend to imitate their often stupid behaviour. Just like kids.
Hobby, we're not arguing, and I obviously didn't think you'd poison cats or anything, I just felt like explaining the reason of my long postings.
Somsak, thanks for the contribution, I think Japanese food is actually very healthy. About whale-hunting, difficult item. I agree that whales would be better off left alone, but as a matter of fact not all whales risk extinction, whereas some other species no one talks about do, and for similar reasons (humans eating them). Pescatarian diet (or itto-vegetarian, like we normally say in Italy) is basically vegetarian diet + fish, Joy. I agree that's the best diet. As long as fish comes from the sea, and not from farming. I started being a vegetarian 15 years ago, but I interrupted my vegetarianism with some pescatarian periods. Nowadays I still can't decide what's best for me, but I am sure I couldn't live as a vegan, especially in such a hot place like Thailand. Even being vegetarian doesn't help my body stand the heat here, which is why I tend to consider pescatarian the best feasible diet (or the lesser evil).
Joy, Pescatarian means people
Joy, Pescatarian means people who eats only fish and vegetables according to my dectionary. Japanese in those days seldom eats chicken and had never eaten pork or beaf.(We only ate them as medicine when we were sick) Our main source of animal protaine came from fish.
When I had a dog in my childhood, I kept him outside and gave him our leftovers everyday. In those days, nobody thought special food for them is necessary let alone giving them expensive clothes. But my dog seemed to be satisfied with his life(I guess) and our familry loved him very much.
I have never liked cats (sorry Alex) because their eyes are sometimes scary, and their charactor seems more complicated than dogs. I always like simple one.
Thanks Alex for yr
Thanks Alex for yr explanation of pescatarian.:-)
Somsak, i think Thai and Japanese seem to treat their dogs similarly ( i mean for domesticated dogs) Wonder what is yr opinion of whale-hunting???:-)
I simply think that we can
I simply think that we can eat whales if it is not facing extinction. Eating whale is part of our culture, so we shold protect them to keep eating whales. This is my basic position. Personally, I don't care much for whale's meat partly because I ate badly cooked whale's meat in school provided launch almost every week. I don't think a lot of Japanese like the meat, neither. So conservationists don't have to worry much if the commercial hunting resumes. It's not a kind of meat which could grab a large market in Japan. (And you should remember the biggest reason to decrease the number of whales rapidly is the commercial hunting by western countries to get whale oil.)
Besides, the overpopulation of whales could break down the balance of ecosystem which was beneficial for human-being. Some reports say that the drastically increased whales eating too much small fish led to the decrease of fish haul in the northern sea area of Japan. If the report is true, restricted commercial hunting should be allowed to cull the number of whales to optimal level, if not full scale lifting of the ban.
Actually I am not so interested in the whale issue,(as I said, I don't like the taste of the meat), so it would be all right for me that Japan be flexible if others don't like the hunting, but conservationist should think twice about whether it's a right thing or not to impose their cultural value on others who don't share their belief. There is not such a thing of universal right of whales. If so, Indian people can claim the right of cows and lobby the ban to eat beef. :)
But I think whales are
But I think whales are mammals (correct me if i'm wrong) and they must suffer a great deal when people hunt and try to kill them. I think the hunting of whales by people from all countries should be banned. I also feel that certain cultural values that cause misery to other living beings should be abolished rather than preserved. Cows /bulls /pigs are also big creatures so it would be good if we stop eating them (although i know this is much easier said than done because it also involves employment, and industry).
I think all creatures
I think all creatures (mammals, fish, probably even plants) suffer when they get killed. That's why, for all I care about animals' rights, I can't be too strict about whale-hunting. To me, whale=cow=cat=shrimp or anything else. What seriously makes me mad is the idea of animal farming. I.e. looking at animals as commercial items that get born, grow up and die in the same horribly small concentration camp, exclusively in order to get as fat as possible and produce milk/eggs/meat/oil or whatever else. Now, THAT is sick. We have no right to impose that on living creatures. As for the rest, although I don't like hunting, I pretty much look at it as one of the possible ways for animals (including the human species) to get their food. I say I can eat fish from the sea because normally until they get fished, they can live normal lives. In that sense, hunting whales is equivalent to hunting wild boars or pheasants in order to eat them. I don't like it, but I'd totally do it if I was in a desert island, and I'd be happy to give up my veggies, until I find a way to build up my own little orchard (that is, if I manage to).
I agree. perhaps to say that
I agree. perhaps to say that we should not hunt mamals simply because they tend to suffer more than others when being hunted or killed is not a good excuse after all, come to think of it.
Alex, my mum does have her own little garden where she grows lots of vegies. She also raises chickens (almost like free ranch chickens) although she hardly eat them nowadays. She lives in a small villager where people sometimes go into the woods to hunt small wild animals, snakes included. ..but i notice that during the past few years some villagers begin to raise a large number of pigs for commercial purpose. In the past, villagers tended to keep only a few pigs.. and although they were given natural food (vegies and rice) , they were kept in pen..so it's still a difficult life for the pigs(raised for food).
"lobby to ban eating beef"
"lobby to ban eating beef" may be a correct pharse?
Alex,
So does the pescetarians rejet to eat farmed fish? Interesting. I made a quick check about the word in wikipedia and found that pesce (fish) is an Itarian word. So the idea must come from your country. But it seems that their rejection against animal farms seems to be based on the logic that human being must not waste grains, which can feed a lot more people otherwise, to feed animals for meats. I think that it's very logical argument given the food shortage in the world becomes more and more a serious problem in the near future.
Somsak, what I wrote here was
Somsak, what I wrote here was just my personal idea. I am aware of some theories (not all) related to the vegetarian/environmentalist/animal-rights movements. The one you mentioned is actually quite good. Not only cereals that are "wasted" in farming could feed more people, but also avoid deforestation and therefore slow down global warming. There are also interesting theories about the gasses produced by farms' animals (their droppings apparently produce emissions which are probably more dangerous in size than the ones produced by cars - but that's just a theory).
I am not sure whether pescatarians always choose not-farmed fish. As a matter of fact it's not even easy to make sure that the fish you buy is not from a farm.
BTW I found a very interesting website
http://transitiontowns.org/
They use a concept that I had used in one of my researches (I thought I had finally invented something, but as usual, I was wrong :( ): the concept of "resilience" applied to economy (I had applied that to a concept of "sustainable company").
Thank you for a lot of good
Thank you for a lot of good tips. Nowadays I tend to think that I don't have to eat meat mainly because of the terrible condition of my teeth.(Mostly artificial) But I am sorry for the young people who might be forced to eat less meat thanks to the inevitable outcome of population explosion. The latest issue of Ntional Geographic focused on this, claiming that Maltus's theory should be reconsidered seriously as well as the green revolution which some conservationists consider evil.
I enjoyed this discussion very much, since I'm a litte tired of Thai politics. Cheers.
I wish i could be as
I wish i could be as independent as a cat. I'm more like a dog. I'm so attached to someone who used to pay attention to me during the last 5 years or so. How can I get over the attachment and the 'subjugation'? Like some dogs, when another human-being shows some interest in me and offers me a more independent form of relationship, my mind still goes back to my old 'owner' and the thought that he perhaps does not see me as important as other people around him at all still causes me pain.
How could one be like a cat, cool, independent and not caring too much?
Should one give up everything
Should one give up everything to maintain the attachment just like a loyal dog Thongdaeng whose main concern is to be loyal to her owner? what does attachment mean after all? Why is a cat able to remain cool and independent and at the same time maintain good relationship with his/her owner? Doesn't the owner sometimes find Thong Dang;s attachment too overwhelming? For dogs like ThongDang, loyalty to owner is seen as one of her best character traits, but obviously things are much more complicated for human beings.
Imagining myself as a dog,
Imagining myself as a dog, when a new human friend shows interest in me and seems willing to accept me the way I am, I'm very grateful for that but the dog trait in me (the desire to be completely attached and perhaps even subjugated) spoils the relationship. If my old human friend can only accept me in a way that is completely based on his own terms, what will i do? should i simply subjugate myself because i dont want to lose that same old complete attachment...What if i regret having to lose the new human friend as well once i make such a decision?
I suppose the best way is to be like a cat: cool and independent, and stop behaving like a dog...I thought i was almost a cat the other day, but my old human friend still has a lot of hold on me, obviously...
Apologies for off-topic/weird
Apologies for off-topic/weird comments again. it's a public holiday here. when people have a bit more time on their hands, their mind just wanders. Now I'm feeling so embarrassed for posting those comments. Can prachatai delete them for me, please? *- * lol * -- *
Regarding farming animals for
Regarding farming animals for food - I'm not a agricultural scientist, but I have seen claims that to produce 1 kg of beef requires several kilos of grain and many litres of water, which to me seems an incredible waste of resources when the original grain & water could just be used for the food in the first place.
Also, farming of animals does not seem a very 'Buddhist' thing to do IMO.
Joy, on such matters, I have always found the best policy was to just follow your heart, at least then your regrets should be less, and can be justified:)
Hobby I'd like to add another
Hobby
I'd like to add another aspect of your discussions. Most of omnivorous creatures( human beings included) are at the top of the food chain, so it's quite natural to find tons of food (and eneregy) required to produce enough food for one omnivore like us. We are not designed to be strictly herbivores, so those who practice vegetarianism should be aware of the possibility of some trace elements deficiency. Mind you, I have nothing against vegetarians, but quite admire them instead.
One more point, the industrial meats are the only way to keep price of these 'cheap protein sources' low and affordable to everyone. I have no direct interest in these industries. Personally, I'm not crazy nor fancy for steaks or some related things, I find those oriental cousines like Japanese, Veitnamese, suit me more than American steaks, and they are healthier I suppose.
I can't count myself a genuine Buddhist, but according to my limited knowledge of Buddhism. The Lord Buddha are not actuallly against eating meats, those hunting or killing for living are not considered serious sins. And the Lord himself was not a vegetarian, he ate anything offered to him, in order to meet basic need for life. But excessive killing for wealth or pleasure is obviously a sin.
Doctor J: I take your point
Doctor J: I take your point about trace elements, however I think the risks are low if one is careful (especially as a pescatarian)
My understanding is that with a proper/sensible vegetarian diet the only likely/possble deficiency is Vit B12, which can easily be taken as a supplement, although I think it is available from other sources such as 'nutritional yeast'.
I originally adopted the diet for quasi health reasons, and after 20 years I cannot see that I would ever go back to meat eating because like Alex I am now also very concerned about animal welfare and wasting of resources.
Sorry to be judgemental again (not really:), but I see excessive meat eating in the same vein as I see using a car when one could have walked or caught public transport - basically as human unconsciousness
"But excessive killing for wealth or pleasure is obviously a sin"
Take a walk down any soi and look at the predominance of vendors selling all forms of cooked animals nowadays (much more than in the past IMO, and I have noticed it is now more difficult to find strictly vegetarian food in Thailand)
Many will differ but I just dont see it as meeting the 'basic need for life' and therefore would put it more in the pleasure category (= sin? :)
However, I accept it is up to each person to decide what diet is appropriate for their own sustenance/survival.
I realize that perhaps I'm
I realize that perhaps I'm indeed a cat after all. After a brief period of confusion, I now realize I do not need my old human friend once he has fully exposed his flaws to me. How could i want to be with somone who is so unsure abt what he really wants?I won't try to act as a thing that he can always hold on to anymore when he himself cannot be the same thing for me.
I suppose friendship is more important than relationship anymore. Thanks for yr friendly advice and friendship , Hobby ( I 'm a regular commentator on yr blog so I suppose we can call each other freinds:-)
President Obama described
President Obama described himself as a "mut"
Sir Salman Rushdie said in the spirit of anti-racist anti-purity of breeds "we are all mongrels"
Thong deng is a mongrel ' So what about his owner and his people? QED
Post new comment