r robin: "am I reading to (sic) much into your blog." No, you're not reading enough into my post, & adding an extremely irrelevant & bizarre 'interpretation', completely of your own idiosyncratic invention.
I suggest you go to the article at the head of the thread. Read it, and then follow the discussion down to my posts. You will then be able to identify the main idea of the discussion, which is not about "lase" majeste, the security forces justifying their existence, national security, or "interesting" (& extremely peculiar) theories. It's about whether it is fair to criticise HR NGOs for operating in a low-key and 'behind the scenes' modus. This is what my story addresses.
r robin: "am I reading to
r robin: "am I reading to (sic) much into your blog." No, you're not reading enough into my post, & adding an extremely irrelevant & bizarre 'interpretation', completely of your own idiosyncratic invention.
I suggest you go to the article at the head of the thread. Read it, and then follow the discussion down to my posts. You will then be able to identify the main idea of the discussion, which is not about "lase" majeste, the security forces justifying their existence, national security, or "interesting" (& extremely peculiar) theories. It's about whether it is fair to criticise HR NGOs for operating in a low-key and 'behind the scenes' modus. This is what my story addresses.
I hope this has been of assistance.