correction, not "had been" but "has been" there for more than decades. Maybe you mixed up Takhor's case, which is related to the new computer law, with Daruni's case which has nothing to do with the com law. And she was even not charged by PAD personel, but the chrge was innitiated by the police during Samak time. They had enough evidences because they recorded her speeches every time. She was sentenced for 18 years, with 3 counts each of which bears 6 years. If the police have charged her earlier, she would not have recieved such a wrong sentence.
correction, not "had been"
correction, not "had been" but "has been" there for more than decades. Maybe you mixed up Takhor's case, which is related to the new computer law, with Daruni's case which has nothing to do with the com law. And she was even not charged by PAD personel, but the chrge was innitiated by the police during Samak time. They had enough evidences because they recorded her speeches every time. She was sentenced for 18 years, with 3 counts each of which bears 6 years. If the police have charged her earlier, she would not have recieved such a wrong sentence.